فصلنامه علوم اجتماعی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

داوران 1399

داوران 1400

داوران 1401

داوران 1402

مرور انتقادی پژوهش‌های جامعه‌شناختی و مدیریتی مبتنی بر نظریه زمینه‌ای (1395-1397)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار جامعه شناسی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

2 دانشیار جامعه شناسی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

چکیده

در یک دهه اخیر، پژوهشگران ایرانیِ حوزه جامعه­شناسی و مدیریت، از نظریه زمینه­ای به شکل گسترده­ای در تحقیقات خود بهره گرفته­اند. با توجه به ویژگی­های خاص این روش­شناسی، مسأله اساسی تحقیق حاضر آن است که پژوهش­های جامعه-شناختی و مدیریتی مبتنی بر نظریه زمینه‌ای از چه نقاط ضعف و قوّتی برخوردارند؟ جهت پاسخ به مسأله تحقیق، از فراروش و تکنیک مرورنظام­مند بهره گرفته شد. جمعیت­های موردمطالعه شامل مجموعه مقالاتی است که در بازه زمانی 1395 تا 1397 در مجلات علمی-پژوهشی داخلی منتشر شده­اند که با توجه به تمرکز مسأله تحقیق بر نقد و بررسی روش­شناسی نظریه زمینه­ای مبتنی بر رویکرد استراوس و کوربین، در مرحله گزینش منابع 36 مقاله انتخاب و موردبررسی قرار گرفتند. نتایج تحقیق بیانگر آن است که تحقیقات مذکور در زمینه معیارهای «صورت‌مسأله تحقیق، تدوین سؤالات جزئی، جامعه موردمطالعه، تشریح مراحل تحلیل داده­ها در بخش یافته­ها، هم‌زمانی گردآوری و تحلیل داده­ها، تکنیک ساخت مقوله، تکنیک تشخیص ابعاد مقوله، تکنیک انتخاب عناوین، تکنیک انتخاب مقوله هسته، اعتباریابی، مقایسه با سایر نظریه­ها و حساسیت نظری» با مشکلات اساسی مواجه هستند. این مشکلات را می­توان در پنج دسته­ چالش­های تکنیکی، شکاف نظریه و روش، تحریف هدف، عدم معرفت کامل به مبانی نظریه زمینه­ای و چالش پارادایمی طبقه­بندی کرد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Critical Review of Sociological and Management Research Based on Grounded Theory (2016-2018)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Fardin Mohammadi 1
  • Mohsen Noghani 2
  • Mahdi Kermani 1

1 Assistant Professor of Sociologyو Ferdowsi University Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Sociology, Ferdowsi University Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran

چکیده [English]

In the last decade, Iranian researchers in the field of sociology and management have widely used the grounded theory in their research. Given the specific features of this methodology, the main issue of the present study is that what are the strengths and weaknesses of sociological and managerial research based on grounded theory? To answer the research question the meta-method and the systematic review were used. The studied population consists of a series of articles published in international scientific journals from 2016 to 2018 that due to the focus of the research on critical methodology of grounded theory based on the approach of Strauss and Corbin, 36 articles were selected and reviewed in the source selection stage. the results of the research indicate that the researches face with fundamental problems about the criteria of “problem, the formulation of micro questions, the studied population, the explanation of the stages of data analysis in the findings select, the coincidence of data collection and analysis, category building technique, category dimensional recognition technique, named selection technique, core category selection technique, credibility, comparison with other theories and theoretical sensitivity”. These problems can be categorized into five categories of technical challenges, the theory and method gap, the distortion of the goal, the lack of knowledge of grounded theory and the paradigmatic challenge.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Grounded Theory
  • Strauss and Corbin’s approach
  • Mete-method
  • Systematic review
مراجع
Azkia, M., & Ghafary, GH. (2009). Sociology of Development. (P. Sarami; f, Alipourgeravnd, Trans.). Tehran, Keihan. [in Persian]
Azkia, M., & Imani Jajarmi, H. (2012). Appleid Research methodologies, applied Grounded theory approach, Tehran: Keyhan [in Persian]
Birks, M., & Mills, J. (2011). Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide, Sage
Blaikie, N. (2011). Approaches to social enquiry. (H. Aghabeigpoury, Trans.). Tehran: jameeshenasan. [in Persian]
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory; a Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis, London, Thousand OAKS, New Delhi: SAGE Publication.
Cho, J. Y., & Lee, E. H. (2014). Reducing Confusion about Grounded Theory and Qualitative Content Analysis: Similarities and Differences. The Qualitative Report, 19 (64), 1- 20.
Chong, C. H., & Yeo, K. J. (2015). An Overview of Grounded Theory Design in Educational Research. Asian social science, 11 (12), 258- 269.
Dnaiyfard,H., Alvani, M., & Azar, A. (2014). Methodology of Qualitative researches in management. Tehran: Saffar [in Persian]
Eaves D. Y. (2001). A synthesis technique for grounded theory data analysis. Methodological issues in nursing research, Blackwell science LTD.
Fassinger, R. E. (2005). Paradigms, praxis, problems and promise: Grounded theory in Grounded theorycuonseling psychology Research Grounded theory, jornal of psychology Research. Vol, 52, NO 2.
Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to Qualitative researches (H. Jalili, Trans.). Tehran: Ney. [in Persian]
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitive Research, Aldintransaction a Division of Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick (U.S.A) and London.
Haghani, F., Shokri, T., Athar, O., Boroumand, M., & Farajzadegan Z. (2014). Comparing Academic Achievement in Lecture-based Learning Versus Problem-based Learning among Medical Students: A Systematic Review, Iranaian journal of medical education. 14 (8), 731-741. [in Persian]
Hitchcock, G., & Hughes, D. (1995). Research and the Teacher. (2nd Ed.) London: Routledge.
Holloway, I. (2005). Qualitative research in health care, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Hutichison, A. J., & Johnston, J. (2011). Grounded theory-based research within exercise psychology; a critical review. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 8, 247-272.
Iman, M.T. (2013). Methodology of Qualitative researches. Ghom: Department of philosophy of social sciences and humanities. [in Persian]
Iman, M.T., & Mohamamdian, M. (2008). Grounded Theory Methodology. Metodology of social sciences and humanities, 14 (56), 31-54. [in Persian]
Lingard, L., Albert, M., & Levinson, W. (2008). Qualitative research, Grounded theory, mixed methods and action research. Practice, BMJ, volume 331
Littell, J. H., Corcoran, J., & Pillai, V. (2008). Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Marshal, K., & Rasman, G. (1998). Qualitative Method. (A. Parsaiian; M, Arabi, Trans.) Tehran: Dafter pazhoheshhaye farhangy. [in Persian]
Mayer, P. (2009). Guidelines for writing a Review Article. Zurich Basel Plant Science Center. 2- 10.
Mccrae, N. (2016). Is it really theoretical? A review of sampling in grounded theory studies in nursing journals. Journal of advanced nursing, 72 (10), 2284- 2293.
Mills, J., & Bonner, A. (2006). The Development of Constructivist Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5 (1), 25- 36.

Mohammadnejad Shorkaiy, M., Jashniy Arani, M., & yazdani, H. (2012). Meta analysis of research conducted in the field of factors affecting customer satisfaction, Journal of Business Management Perspective. 10 (2). 141- 164. [in Persian]

Mohammadpour, A. (2011). Counter Method; logic and design in Qualitative Methodology. Tehran: jameeshenasan. [in Persian]
Mohammadpour, A. (2014). Modernizasion experience; study of change and development in horaman with Grounded theory. Tehran: jameeshenasan. [in Persian]
Morse, J. M. (2001). Siuating Grounded theory within Qualitive inquiry in Schreiber, Rita S., & Phyllis. N. (2001). Using Grounded theory in Nursing, springer Publisher Company, newyork.
Neuman, W.L. (1999). Social Research Methods; Qualitive and Quantitative approach, second edition.university of Wisconsin at white water.
Neuman, W.L. (2006). Basic of social Research; Qualitive and Quantitative approach, second edition.

Pandit, N. R. (1996). The Creation of Theory: A Recent Application of the Grounded Theory Method. The Qualitative Report, 2(4), 1-15.

Rabbani Khorasghani, A., & Abbaszadeh, M. (2010). Grounded Theory approach, Journal of applied sociology. 20 (4), 163- 183. [in Persian]
Rintala, M.T., Paarilainen. E I., & Asted, T-K. (2014). Challngea in combing different data sets during analysis when using grounded theory, nurser Researcher.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (2012). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (E. Afshar, Trans.). Tehran, Iran: Ney.
Turner, J. R. (2014). Grounded Theory Building for the Workplace, Performance Impartment, 53 (3). 31- 39.
Urquhart, C., & Fernandez, W. (2013). Using grounded theory method in information systems: the Research as Blank slate and other myths, jornal of information technology, 28, research aricle.
Valvi, A. C., Frangos, C.t, I. C., & Frangos, C. (2013). Online and mobile customer behavior: a Critical evaluation of grounded theory studies. Behaviour & Informartion technology, 32 (1), 655-667.
Zamani, B., & Babaei. E. (2021). A Critical Review of Grounded Theory Research in Urban Planning and Design, Planning Practice & Research, 36:1, 77-90.
Zolfagharian,M. R., & Latifi, M. (2012). Grounded theory with Nvivo8. Tehran: university of imam sadegh. [in Persian]
فصلنامه علوم اجتماعی
دوره 27، شماره 90
مهر 1399
صفحه 61-104
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار