نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری جامعه شناسی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

2 استاد جامعه شناسی دانشکده علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار جامعه شناسی، دانشکده ادبیات علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

چکیده

واکاوی تکامل نهاد خانواده و فهم چگونگی ساخت ارتباط عاطفی در زندگی زناشویی یکی از دغدغه‍های اصلی نظریه اجتماعی مدرن بوده است. بر این اساس مقاله حاضر با استفاده از مطالعه کیفی و اتخاذ رویکرد پدیدارشناختی و استفاده از روش تحلیل مضمونی به دنبال پاسخ به این سؤال است که زوجین وفاداری را چگونه تجربه می‍کنند و مفهوم وفاداری در حیات معاصر شهروندان تهرانی، دارای چه گونه‌بندی‌های معنایی است. ابزار گردآوری داده‍ها مصاحبه عمیق و نیمه ساخت‍یافته است. حجم نمونه شامل 31 مصاحبه با زنان و مردانی است که دارای تجربه زناشویی بالای یک سال بوده‍اند. شیوه نمونه‍گیری بر اساس استراتژی نمونه‍گیری هدفمند صورت پذیرفته و مدت‌زمان هر مصاحبه بین 50 تا 90 دقیقه است. یافته‍های پژوهش نشان می‍دهد که از حیث نگرشی 3 دیدگاه متمایز به وفاداری در زندگی زناشویی وجود دارد که دیدگاه نخست وفاداری را یک الزام بلندمدت و خدشه‍ناپذیر تصور می‍کند. دیدگاه دیگر وفاداری را امری سیال و تغییرپذیر می‍داند و امکان شکست و جدایی را یک امر بالقوه برای ارتباط می‍داند و درنهایت دیدگاهی که وفاداری را موضوعی ترمیمی و تجدیدشونده می‍داند که در حیات زناشویی بازخوانی و ابداع دوباره می‍شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Fidelity Types and Procedures for Forming it in Married Life

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zeinab Malekipour 1
  • Soheila Sadeghi Fasaei 2
  • Asemeh Ghasemi 3

1 Ph. D Candidate of Sociology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Professor of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

3 Assistant Professor of Sociology, Faculty of literature humanities and social sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Analyzing the evolution of the family institution and understanding how to build emotional relationships in married life has been one of the main concerns of modern social theory. Accordingly, the present article, using a qualitative study and adopting a phenomenological approach and using thematic analysis, seeks to answer the question of how couples experience fidelity and what semantic classifications the concept of fidelity has in the contemporary life of Tehrani citizens. The data collection tool was in-depth and semi-structured interview. The sample size included 31 interviews with women and men who were married for more than one year. The sampling method was based on the purposive sampling strategy and each interview lasted between 50 to 90 minutes. The findings of the research show that there are 3 distinct views on fidelity in married life: The first view of which is that fidelity is long-term and inviolable. Another view considers fidelity as fluid and changeable. And finally, a view that considers fidelity as a restorative and renewing issue that is read and invented within married life.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Fidelity
  • Marital Life
  • Communication Fluidity
  • Communication Restoration
  • Phenomenological Analysis
 
Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing Brand Equity. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Aknin, L. B. & Human, L. J. (2015). Give a piece of you: Gifts that reflect givers promote closeness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 60:8–16..
Atari, M., & Chegeni, R. (2017). The Dark Triad and long-term mate preferences in Iranian women. Personality and Individual Differences. 104: 333–335.
 Badiou, B. (2017). In praise of love. Translated by Maryam Abdul Rahim Kashi, Tehran: Qoqnoos Publication.
Baruch D. et al (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy: enhancing the relationships. Journal of Clinical Case Studies. 8 (3): 241-257.
Biao, L., Wenpei, F., Jie, Sh. & Xue, F. (2019). Gift–image congruence and gift appreciation in romantic relationships: The roles of intimacy and relationship dependence, Journal of Business Research. 103:142–152.
Birkás, B., Láng, A. & Meskó, N. (2018). Self-rated attractiveness moderates the relationship between dark personality traits and romantic ideals in women. Psychological Reports. 121:184–200.
Clark, M. S., & Mills, J. (1979). Interpersonal attraction in exchange and communal relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37(1): 12–24
Clyde, T. L., Hawkins, A. & Willoughby, B. (2020). Revising premaritalrelationship interventions for the next generation. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 46(1): 149-164
Dainton, M, Aylor, B. (2002). Routine and strategic maintenance efforts: Behavioral patterns, variations associated with relational length, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Commun Monogr. 69: 52-.66
Dunn, E., Huntsinger, J., Lun, J. & Sinclair, S. (2008). The gift of similarity: How good and bad gifts influence relationships. Social Cognition. 26: 469–481.
Giddens, A. (2011). World Visions, Translated by Mohammad Reza Jalaipour, Tehran: New Publishing
Guillard, V.,  Roux, D. (2014). Macromarketing issues on the sidewalk: How “gleaners” and “disposers” (re) create a sustainable economy. Journal of Macromarketing. 34(3):291-312.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture's consequences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Hou, Y., Jiang, F. & Wang, X. (2019). Marital commitment, communication andmarital satisfaction: An analysis based on actor–partner interdependence model. International Journal of Psychology. 54(3): 369-376
Huei, S. A., Lindsey, C.R. & Elliott, T.R. (2007). Church attendance and marital commitment belifes of undergraduate women. Journal of applied social psychology. 37(3): 501-514
Kleine, M. (2011). The Impact of Accounts and Attributions Following Marital Infidelity. A Dissertation Resented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy. University of Missouri-Columbia.
Lee, BH, O’Sullivan, LF. (2019). Walk the line: How successful are efforts to maintain monogamy in intimate relationships? Arch Sex Behav. 48: 1735-48.
Mo’meni, Kh., Kavoosi Omid, S, S. & Amani, R. (2015). Predicting marital commitment based on self-differentiation, family solidarity and adaptability, and marital intimacy. Journal of Pathology, counseling and family enrichment. 1 (2): 46-58.
Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing. 63(4_suppl1): 33–44.
Pamela, A. Shang, E., Dennis, F., Kristen, H. & Jonathan , M. (2020). The Impact of Relationship Stressors on Trust and Prorelationship behavior Within Adolescent Romantic Relationships: A Systems Approach. Journal of Adolescent Health. 68 (3): 558-564.
Rachel. W. & Laura , E. (2017). Moral alchemy: How love changes norms. Cognition, (167):1-16.
Sarkar, A. (2014). Brand love in emerging market: a qualitative investigation. Qualitative Market Research. 17(4): 481-494.
Sinclair, L and Fehr, B (2005). Voice versus loyalty: Self-construals and responses to dissatisfaction in romantic relationshipsq. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 41:298–304.
Singelis, T. M. (1994). The measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 20(5): 580–591.
Teriveh, B., Karimi, K., Akbari., M & Moradi, O. (2019). The structural model of marital commitment based on marital communication beliefs, emotional conflict and criticism in the family: the mediating role of marital intimacy. Journal of Applied Psychology. 14(1): 139-158.Tester,.K. (2004). The Social Thought Of Zygbunt Bauman. UK. Palgrave Macmillan publication.
Webster, D., Laurenceau, j., Smith, C.V., Mahaffey., A., Bryan., A. & Brunell, A. (2015). An investment model of socio sexuality, relationship satisfaction, and commitment: Evidence from dating, engaged, and newlywed couples. Journal of Research in Personality. 55 (2015): 112–126
Weigel, D. J., Brown, C. & O'Riordan, C. (2011). Everyday Expressions of Commitment and Relational Uncertainty as Predictors of Relationship Quality and Stability Over Time. Communication Reports. 24: 38-50.
Zahid Zahidani, S, S. & Kaveh, M (2016). Pathology of family changes, emphasizing the role of cultural globalization on gender interactions and sexual orientation, Journal of crime prevention approach. 2: 148-174.
References [In Persian]
Zarean, M. & Chaboki, Umm al-Binin (2019). The relationship between consumerism and the commodity view of humans with the fluidity of love in married life, Journal of women in development and politics. 16 (4): 483-498. [In Persian]
Zarandi, M., Hashemian Far, S.A. & Kian Pour, M. (2017). Women and the social construction of marital commitment: Case study: Isfahan city. Journal of Culture strategy. 10 (38): 127-163. [In Persian]
Torabifar, M (2017). What it is, criteria and examples of fidelity in married relationships. (In Persian). Tehran: Islamic Maaref University.
Tamilson, J. (2002). Globalization and culture. Translated into Persian by Mohsen Hakimi. Tehran: Farhang and Andisheh Publication.
Sohrab Zadeh, M & Parnian, L. (2016). Classification of tendency to marry among studied girls: students of Shiraz University. Iranian Cultural Research Quarterly. 9 (1): 83-114. [In Persian]
Nazari, H. (2019). Family Law Policy. Ph.D. Thesis on Social Issues, (In Persian). Department of Social Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran.
Narimani, A. & Bagher Habi, M (2018). The effectiveness of therapy focused on acceptance and commitment on women's marital compatibility. Journal of Counseling and family psychotherapy. 8 (1): 166-182. [In Persian]
 McCarthy, Jane R. & Edwards, R (2011). Key Concepts in Family Studies. Translated into Persianby Mehdi Labibi. Tehran: Elm Publication.
Marshall, B. (2011). The experience of modernity. Translated into Persian by Morad Farhadpour. Tehran:Tarhn: Now Publication.
Lashani, L. & Farhoudian, A. (2013). Acceptance and commitment therapy in the satisfaction of veterans with spinal cord injuries spouses. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal. 11(2), 56-60. [In Persian]
Sabouhi, R., Fatehi Zadeh, M., Ahmadi. A. & Eatemadi, O. (2016). The effect of counseling based on the approach based on acceptance and commitment on the marital satisfaction of women referring to culture centers in Isfahan city. Scientific Research Quarterly Journal of Cognitive and Behavioral Sciences. 6 (2): 53-64. [In Persian]
Hosseini, S R., Jalali, M.R. & Kakavand. A.R. (2017). Predicting extramarital relationships on the Internet based on marital commitment with the mediation of emotional sexual connection. Quarterly Journal of Excellence in Counseling and Psychotherapy. 7 (26): 4-19. [In Persian]
Ghafourian Niuroozi, P., Asghari Ebrahim Abad, M.J., Abdkhodaei, M.S., & Kimiaei, S.A. (2018), The role of individual, family, social and religious factors in married women's extramarital relationships and presenting a treatment model based on related factors: a qualitative research. Journal of Social psychological studies of women. 16 (4): 7-42. [In Persian]
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self Identity: Self and Society in The Late Modern Age. Translated into Persian by Naser Movafaghian. Tehran: Ney Publication.
Fouladiyan, M., Baradaran Kashi, Z. & Diyari, M.. (2021). Sociological analysis of extramarital relationship emergence processes (case study: men and women applying for divorce in Mashhad), Journal of social studies and research in Iran. 10 (1): 1-37. [In Persian]
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Translated into Persian by Hasan Danaeifard and Hosein Kazemi. Tehran: Saffar Publication.
Choupani, M., Fatehi Zadeh, M., Asenjarani, F. & Kastero Kouria, A.M. (2021). Existential phenomena in men’s marital infidelity. Journal of family research. 17 (3): 483-513. [In Persian]

 Bauman, z. (2015). Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds. Translated into Persian by Erfan Sabeti. Tehran: Qoqnoos Publication.

Benjamin, w. (2011). one way Street. Translated into Persian by Hamid Farazandeh. Tehran: Markaz Publication.
 Bagheri, Shahla., Madahi, J. & Lotfi Khakchi, T. (2020). Constructing the meaning of delayed marriage age based on contextual theory (case study: female students of Mashhad city. Journal of women in development and politics. 17 (1): 43-69. [In Persian]
Alvin, T. (1992). Third Wave. Translated into Persian by Shahindokht Kharazmi.Tehran: Now Publication.
Agha Mohamad Kashi, L (2020). The relationship between early maladaptive schemas and marital commitment with marital satisfaction. Journal of New Advances in Behavioral Sciences. 4 (40):1-16. [In Persian]
 
استناد به این مقاله: ملکی‌پور، زینب.، صادقی فسایی، سهیلا.، قاسمی، عاصمه. (1401). گونه‌های وفاداری و رویه‌های شکل‌دهی به آن در زندگی زناشویی، 29(97)، 39-79.
DOI: 10.22054/qjss.2023.73001.2627
 Social sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License...