فصلنامه علوم اجتماعی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

داوران 1399

داوران 1400

داوران 1401

داوران 1402

سیاست‌گذاری آسیب‌های اجتماعی در دهه 60

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری جامعه شناسی مسائل اجتماعی ، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

2 استادیار جامعه شناسی دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

3 دانشیار جامعه شناسی دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

4 استاد جامعه شناسی دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران

چکیده

با توجه به ارتباط وثیق سیاست‌گذاری اجتماعی با ساحت سیاست، سعی بر آن است که شکل­گیری سیاست­های اجتماعی مربوط به آسیب­های اجتماعی در دوران انقلاب به‌عنوان نقطه عطف تحولات سیاسی با عطف توجه به نظریه حکومت­مندی میشل فوکو تحلیل شود. لذا به‌منظور عینیت­بخشی به مراحل روشی کار تحلیل محتوای مضمونی مورداستفاده قرار گرفت. همچنین جهت پاسخ­گویی به سؤالات پژوهش، داده­های موردنیاز از سنجه­های غیر واکنشی و براى گزینش نمونه­ها از شیوه نمونه­گیرى نظری استفاده شد. یافته­ها، حاکی از آن است که منطبق بر شرایط اجتماعی و سیاسی حاکم بر آن دوران، سیاست­گذاری انقلابی که از ترکیب مضامین هم­نشینی گناه/ جرم/ آسیب، سلطه رویکرد حقوقی و مداخلات قضایی انتظامی، پاک­سازی اخلاقی، سیاست­گذاری حمایتی و مواجهه با معلول­ها، معنا یافته بود بر سپهر سیاست‌گذاری آسیب­های اجتماعی در ابتدای انقلاب، تسلط یافت. به‌طورکلی، در سیاست­گذاری این دوره، ابعاد اجتماعی سیاست­گذاری آسیب­های اجتماعی به نفع ابعاد حقوقی و قضایی کمتر مدنظر قرار گرفته است؛ اما نکته قابل‌تأمل و البته مثبت در جریان هژمون شدن، تدوین و اجرای سیاست­های مزبور، پذیرش اجتماعی آن سیاست­ها بود؛ بنابراین، لازم است در سیاست­گذاری­ها، به مسئله پذیرش اجتماعی آن توجه جدی شود، چراکه پذیرش اجتماعی هر نوع سیاستی، ضامن موفقیت و به ثمرنشستن آن سیاست است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Policymaking of Social Damages in the 60s

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mehdi Kaveh 1
  • Mansour Tabiee 2
  • Mahmood Shahabi 3
  • Habib Ahmadi 4

1 PhD Candidate in Sociology of Social Issues, Shiraz University , Shiraz, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Sociology, Shiraz University Shiraz, Iran

3 Associate Professor of Sociology, Shiraz University Shiraz, Iran

4 Professor of Sociology, Shiraz University Shiraz, Iran

چکیده [English]

Considering the close relationship between social policy making and political field, it’s attempted to analyze forming of social policies related to social harms during the revolution as a turning point in political developments with a view to Foucault's theory of governance. In order to objectify the methodological steps, thematic analyses were used. Also in order to answer the research questions, the required data were used as non-reactive criteria and theoretical sampling method was used to select the samples. According to  the prevailing social and political conditions, a revolutionary discourse that elaborates on the synchronization of moments of guilt / crime / harm, the dominance of the legal approach and judicial intervention, moral cleansing, protectionist policy-making and coping with disability. It made sense to dominate the sphere of social harm policy-making at the beginning of the revolution. In the discourse of this period, the social dimension of social harm policy-making in favor of the legal dimension was less considered. But the point to consider during the hegemony of policies was their social acceptance. It is necessary to pay serious attention to the issue of social acceptance, because social acceptance of any policy guarantees the success of that policy.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Social Policy
  • Social Harms
  • Governance Theory
  • Revolutionary Policy
مراجع
Abedi jaefari, H,. Taslimi, M,. Faghihi, A,. Shikh zadeh, M,. (2017). Thematic Analysis and Thematic Matrix, Strategic Management Thought, 2(10). (PP. 151-198).
Amjadi, H., Motallebi, M., Ganji,G. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Socio-welfare Policies in Ahmadinejad's and Rouhani's Governments. Journal of Iranian Social Development Studies. 12(47). (PP. 177-191).
Boyatzis. (1998). Transforming Qualitative Information. Cleveland: Sage.
 Braun, V. &. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis In Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, (PP. 77-101).
Burchell, G., Colin, G., & Peter, M. )1991(. Foucault effect: Studies in Governmentality, with two lectures by and an interview with Michel Foucault. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1985). Discourse and Truth. The Problematization of Parrhesia, ed. by J. Pearson, Northwestern University: Evanston/Illinois.
Foucault, M. (2017). Discourse and trust, Translated by: Ferdowsi, A. Tehran: Dibaye Publication. [in Persian].
Glassman, M., Karno, D., & Erdem, G. (2010). The problems and barriers of RHYA as social policy, Children and Youth Services Review, 32 (32), (PP. 789-806).
Gunnar, S. (2014) Away with tobacco? On the early understandings of tobacco as a problem and the associated attempts at political regulation of tobacco in Norway 1900–1930, Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, VOL. 31. (PP. 5-26).
Habibporgatabi, K. (2014). Sociology of Educational Policy in Iran through Governmentality Lens. Social Development and Welfare. 6 (21). (PP. 223-284).
Hadi zenooz B. (2005). Poverty and Inequality of Income in Iran. Social Welfare Quarterly, 5 (17). (PP. 165-206).
Inda, J. )2005). Anthropologies of modernity: Foucault, governmentality, and life politics. Australia, Victoria: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Jalaeipour, H, R,. Saeidi, A,. Habibipour, K. (2020). Analyzing Social Policy with Governmentality Lens. Journal of Sociologicaj Review. 19 (2). (PP. 167-200).
Khashei, V,. Mostame, R. (2013). Policy Making in the State of Socio-cultural Anomie, Culture-communication Studies. 24 (14). (PP. 63-81).
kourehpaz, M,. Hossein & Naderi, H. (2022) A Consideration on the Epistemological Foundations of the justification of State Punitiveness based on the Construction of the Enemy from the Offenders, Criminal Law Research, Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript Available Online from 17 April 2022.
Lemke, Thomas (2000) Foucault, governmentality and critique, paper presented at the Rethinking Marxism Conference. University of Amherst MA, (PP. 21-24).
Marston, G., & McDonald, C. (Eds.). (2006). Analysing Social Policy: A Governmental Approach. Cheltenham, UK. Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Milani, M. (2006). The making of Iran's Islamic revolution: form monarchy to Islamic republic, Translated by,Atar Zadeh, M, Tehran: Game Noo Publication. [in Persian].
Mirzamohammadi, A. (2015). Analysis of Discourse Construct of Social Control Laws of the Islamic Pariliamentary Council (Majlis), Ph.D in Sociology (Social Problems of Iran) Department of Social science, Payame Noor University. [in Persian].
Neuendorf, K. (2016) The content analysis Guidebook, translated by, bakhshi & jalaeian bakhshandeh, mashhad: jahad daneshgahi.
Nourbakhsh, Younes & naderi, hamid (2020). Analysis of changes in the types of State-Society relations in the formation of social issues and the occurrence of anomic status,Sociological Review, Volume 27, Issue 1. (PP. 199-222).
Parvaii, S,. Mousaaei, M. (2020). Exclusion of Ageing in Social Policy Analyzing Development Plans after the Revolution. Journal of Social Problems of Iran.. 8 (28). (PP. 59-83).
Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: California.
Piran, P. (2003). Social Policy, Social Development and it’s Necessity in Iran The Criticism of Copenhagen Convention.. Social Welfare Quarterly. 3 (10). (PP. 121-154).
Program and budget organization. (1368). Law of the First Economic, Social and Cultural Development Plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Program and budget organization. (1368). Law of the Secend Economic, Social and Cultural Development Plan of the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Qarakhani, M. (2011). Social Policy Research in Iran. Social Development and Welfare. 3 (9). (PP. 123-148).
Qarakhani, M. (2013). The Government and Health Policy in Iran (1981-2009). Journal of Social Sciences. 20 (61). (PP. 211-254).
Qarakhani, M. (2014). Conditions of Possibility and Reasons for Preventing the Establishment of the Interdisciplinary of “Social Policy” in Iran. Journal of Social Sciences. 6 (2). (PP. 33-55).
Qarakhani, M. (2017). Social Policy in Iran: The Gap Between the State and the Nation. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities. 23 (75). (PP. 93-118).
Qarakhani, M. (2019). Non-Uniformity Social Policy in Iran (Education and Employment of Women). Journal of Social Sciences. 9 (2). (PP. 95-114).
Qarakhani, M. (2020). Government and social policy in Iran.Tehran: Agah Publication. [in Persian].
Rose, N. and Miller, P (1992) ‘Political power beyond the state: problematics of government’, British Journal of Sociology 43, 2. (PP. 172-205).
Sadeghi, A,. farajiha M,. habibzade, M,. Omidi Jalil, J (2017). Comparative study of the consequences of sentencing in drug crimes based on the quantity of drugs in the legislative system of Iran and the United States of America. Comparative Law Researches (CLR); 21 (1). (PP. 81-104).
Saeidi, ali asghar (2011). Social policies, Iran's social situation report (2001-2009), Tehran: Rahman Institute.
Sam Aram, E, A,. Hosseini haji bakandeh, S, A,. Mousavi, H. (2017). Social Policy-Making in the Field of Social Harms in the Laws of the Country's Development Plan. Social Welfare Quarterly, 9 (1). (PP.
فصلنامه علوم اجتماعی
دوره 28، شماره 95
اسفند 1400
صفحه 1-35
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار