نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری علوم سیاسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران

2 استادیار علوم سیاسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد رباط کریم، ایران

چکیده

هدف از پژوهش حاضر بررسی و نقد نظریه مدرنیته ایرانی علی میرسپاسی به عنوان یکی از تحلیل‌های مهمی است که درخصوص مواجهه ایرانیان با مدرنیته انجام شده و در آن سعی شده تا الگوهای چندگانه از مدرنیته به عنوان یک نظریه جدید ارائه شود. این پژوهش با استفاده از روش تحلیلی -  انتقادی می‌خواهد ضمن تحلیل شاخصه‌های اصلی نظریه مدرنیته ایرانی به ارزیابی و نقد سویه‌های انتقادی و ایجابی آن در بررسی تحولات ایران معاصر بپردازد. توجه به کاستی‌های تحلیل وی شامل توجه صرفش به جنبه‌های فکری و فرهنگی مدرنیته ایرانی و عدم توجه به جنبه‌های ساختاری و نهادی موثر در تکوین این پدیده و همچنین تاکید شدید به نقش روشنفکران درترویج اسلام سیاسی و عدم توجه به نقش نیروها و نهادهای سنتی در انقلاب اسلامی و نقد سویه‌های ایجابی الگوی پیشنهادی وی که مبتنی بر تنوع در تجربه‌های فرهنگی و تاریخی از مدرنیته و تلاش برای ترسیم سیمای غیراروپامحور از آن است از مهم‌ترین یافته‌های این پژوهش است. نتیجه کلی این پژوهش نشان‌گر آن است که نظریه مدرنیته ایرانی ضمن ارائه رویکرد و چشم‌اندازی جدید به مطالعه تاریخ معاصر ایران برخی از ابعاد مهم آن را نادیده و همین امر هم ضرورت ارائه پژوهش‌های جدیدتر نمایان می‌سازد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Iranian Modernity: A Critique of Ali Mirsepasi’s Viowpoint

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Nezhadiran 1
  • Rozhan Hesam Ghazi 2

1 PhD of Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor of Political Sciences, Robat Karim Islamic Azad University, , Iran

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this study was to review and criticize the theory of Iranian modernity, Ali Mirsepasi, as one of the most important analyses that has been done on the Iranian in face of modernity which has tried to present multiple models of modernity as a new theory. The current study has used the analytical-critical method, while analyzing the main features of the theory of Iranian modernity, evaluating and criticizing its critical and positive aspects in the study of contemporary Iranian developments. Shortcomings of his analysis include paying great attention to the intellectual and cultural aspects of Iranian modernity while not paying attention to the structural and institutional aspects of it which effects the development of modernity. Moreover role of intellectuals in promoting political Islam and traditional forces and institutions in the Islamic Revolution have not been addressed. One of the most important findings of the current research is shedding light on positive aspects of his proposed model, which is based on the diversity of cultural and historical experiences of modernity and the attempt to draw a non-European-oriented image of it. The general result of this research indicates that the theory of Iranian modernity, while presenting a new approach and perspective to the study of contemporary Iranian history, postpones some of its crucial aspects emphasizing the need for new research.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • modernity
  • Critical Approach
  • Mirsepasi
  • intellectuals
  • Islamic revolution
Abrahamian, E. (1993). Khomeinism: Essays on the Islamic Republic, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Abrahamian, Y. (1998). Iran between two revolutions, translated by Ahmad Golmohammadi and Mohammad Ibrahim Fattahi, Tehran: Nashrni.
Agambon, G. (2020). Humans and Bats; Capitalism in the Corona Age, translated by Mohammad Qaraguzlu, Tehran: Updated
Aghajani Ghannad, A. (2009). A Comparative Study of the Opinions of Dr. Davari and Dr. Mirsepasi; Iranian Politics and Society, Pegah Hozeh Magazine, No. 255
Ajoudani, M (2004). Iranian Constitution, Tehran: Akhtaran.
Al-Ahmad, J. (1965). Westernization, Tehran: Ferdows.
Azad Armaki, T. (2002). Iranian Modernity; Intellectuals and the intellectual paradigm of backwardness in Iran, Tehran: Community.
Berman, M. (2000). The Experience of Modernity, translated by Morad Farhadpour, Tehran: New Design.
Boroujerdi, M. (2010). Shaved, worshiped, broken, Tehran: Contemporary view.
Eisenstadt, S. (1999). Multiple Modernities in an Age of Globalization,Canadian Journal of Sociology, Vol. 24, No. 2, pp 283-295.
Eisenstadt, S. (2000) Multiple Modernities, Daedalus, Vol 120, No. 1, Winter.
Eisenstadt, S. (2001). The civilizational dimension of modernity, International sociology, vol 16 (3): 320-340.
Escobar, A. (1992). Planning, In the Development Dictionary: A Guide to Knowledge as Power. Wolfgang Sachs, Ed. London: Zed Books.
Escobar,A. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton:Princeton University Press.
Foucault, M. (1996). What do Iranians have in mind, translated by Hossein Masoumi Hamdani, Tehran: Ney Publishing.
Furan, J. (1998). Fragile Resistance (History of Social Developments in Iran from Safavid to the years after the Islamic Revolution), translated by Ahmad Tadayon, Tehran: Rasa Cultural Services Institute.
Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
Hesam Ghazi, R. (2016). Underdevelopment Modernism and the Alienation of the New Middle Class in Iran, Tehran: Avae Noor.
Homayoun Katozian, M. (1998). Political Economy of Iran, translated by Mohammad Reza Nafisi and Kambiz Azizi, Tehran: Markaz Publishing.
Kashani, S. (2020). Political Modernity in Iran, Tehran: New Plan
Kasravi, A. (2008). History of the Constitution of Iran, Tehran ‌: Amirkabir.
Lerner, D. (1958). The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing the Middle East. New York: Free Press.
Maaref, S. A. (2001). A new look at the principles of human wisdom, Tehran: Raizan.
Marx, K. (1972). The British Rule in India,in On Colonialism; Articles from the New York Tribune and Other Writings, New York:International Publishers.
Mirsepasi, A. (2002). Democracy or Truth, Tehran: New Plan.
Mirsepasi, A. (2005). Reflections on Iranian Modernity, translated by Jalal Tavaklian, Tehran: New Design.
Mirsepasi, A. (2007). Iranian Intellectuals: Narratives of Despair and Hope, translated by Abbas Mokhber, Tehran: Development.
Mirsepassi, A. (2010). Democracy in Modern Iran: Islam, Culture, and Political Change, NYU Press.
Mirsepassi, A. (2017). Transnationalism in Iranian Political Thought: The Life and Times of Ahmad Fardid, Cambridge University Press.
Mirsepassi, A. (a2019). Iran's Troubled Modernity: Debating Ahmad Fardid's Legacy, Cambridge University Press.
Mirsepassi, A. (b2019). Iran's Quiet Revolution, Cambridge University Press.
Moadel, M. (2003). The Class of Politics and Ideology in the Iranian Revolution, translated by Mohammad Salar Kasraei, Tehran: Open.
Richard, Paul & Elder, Linda (2007) The Art of Socratic Questioning, Based on Thinking Concept & Tools. Foundation For critical Thinking press.
Saeed, E. (1992). Oriental Studies, translated by Abdolrahim Gavahi, Tehran: Islamic Culture Publishing Office.
Shariati, A. (1982). Worldview and Ideology, Tehran: Publishing Company.
Shariati, A. (1990). Return, Tehran: Inspiration.
Shariati, A. (2003). Descent into the Desert, Tehran ‌: Print.‌
Tabatabai,S. J. (2007a) Tabriz School and the Principles of Modernism, Tehran: Sotoudeh.
Tabatabai,S. J. (2007b). Theory of Rule of Law in Iran, Tehran: Sotoudeh.
Touraine, A. (1995). Critique of Modernity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Vajdat, F. (2003). Iran's intellectual confrontation with modernity, translated by Mehdi Haghighatkhah, Tehran: Phoenix
Towfigh, E. (2000). Modernisierung und postkoloniale Herrschaft in Iran: Versuch über den Staat (Umbrüche der Moderne), IKO, Verlag für interkulturelle Kommunikation.
Wagner, P. (2008). Modernity as experience and interpretation: A new sociology of modernity. London: Polity.