بررسی جامعه‌شناختی جوک‌‌‌های مرتبط با روابط گروه‌‌‌های اجتماعی در ایران (با تأکید بر جوک‌های تلگرامی سال‌97)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری جامعه شناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز، تهران

2 استادیار جامعه شناسی دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران مرکز، تهران، ایران

3 استادیارجامعه شناسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، واحد بابل، بابل، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر به بررسی جامعه‌شناختی جوک‌‌‌های مرتبط با روابط گروه‌‌‌های اجتماعی در ایران (با تأکید بر جوک‌‌‌های تلگرامی سال 97) می‌پردازد و تلاش می‌کند به این پرسش‌ها پاسخ دهد: جوک‌ها از نظر بعد اجتماعی حاوی چه پیام‌‌هایی درباره گروه‌های اجتماعی هستند؟ این پیام‌‌ها چه احساساتی را بیان می‌کند؟ برای پاسخ به این پرسش‌ها با بررسی ادبیات موجود در حوزه جامعه‌شناسی احساسات و جامعه‌شناسی جوک از نظریه قدرت و منزلت کمپر بهره گرفته شد. این پژوهش با روش تحلیل محتوای کمی و کیفی انجام گردیده و جامعه آماری آن جوک‌های مبادله شده در شبکه‌های اجتماعی تلگرام در سال 97 است. نتایج این پژوهش در محتوای جوک‌ها نشان می‌دهد؛ جنسیت، قومیت و خانواده مهم‌ترین مسائل گروهی و درون‌گروهی است که بیشترین تقابلات قدرتی و جایگاهی در آن‌ها دیده‌شده است. از سوی دیگر جوک‌ها به‌عنوان ابزاری کارآمد در جهت انتقاد به نابرابری قدرتی و جایگاهی در گروه‌های مختلف اجتماعی استفاده می‌گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Sociological Investigation of the Jokes Associated with the Relations among Social Groups in Iran (With Emphasis on Telegram Jokes in 2018)

نویسندگان [English]

  • parniya razipur 1
  • farah torkaman 2
  • ali rahmani 3
1 Ph.D. Candidate of Sociology , Islamic, Azad University , Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 Assistant Professor of Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor of Sociology, Islamic Azad University, Babol Branch, Iran
چکیده [English]

The present research aimed at the sociological study of the jokes associated with the relations among different social groups in Iran, with emphasis on Telegram jokes in 2018, and attempted to answer the following questions: What messages do the jokes have about social groups from the social perspective? What feelings do these messages want to express? In order to answer these questions, we have used Kemper’s Power-Status Theory alongside investigating the existing literature on the sociology of emotions and sociology of humor. This research was conducted using quantitative-qualitative content-analysis method and the statistical population of the research was the jokes exchanged on Telegram in 2018. The results of the research on the content of the jokes indicate that the concepts of gender, ethnicity and family constitute the most significant group and intra-group issues, in which power and status confrontations are seen at most. On the other hand, jokes are used as efficient instruments for criticizing power and status inequalities in different social groups.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Humor-Joke
  • status
  • Power
  • social groups
Abedinfard, M. (2015). Homur and Gender Hegemony the panoptical Role of ridicule vis –a –visbc Gender universitity af albert.
Ameli, R. (2008). New Individualism and Mobile Phones, Individualism Technology and Identity, Media Journal, No. 2. [in Persian]
Ashraf N, Ali; Gholipour, M. (2018). New Social Media and Their Role in Mass Representation: A Realistic Analysis of the Egyptian Revolution, Quarterly Journal of New Media Studies, Fourth Year. No. 14: 148-173. [in Persian]
Barnouw, G. Schramm, . W (1989). International Encyclopedia of Communications, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Bastani, S; Khaniki, H, Arkanzadeh Yazdi, S. (2018). Mainstream Media People and New Media Consumption Survey of Consumption, Trust, Satisfaction and Media Participation of Tehran Citizens, Quarterly Journal of New Media Studies, Fourth Year, No. 14: 33-1. [in Persian]
Chan, YC1 (2016). Neural Correlates of Sex/Gender Differences in Humor Processing for Different Joke Types. Apr 26;7:536. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00536.
Darnhofer. (2018). Using Comic-Style Posters for Engaging Participants and for Promoting Researcher Reflexivity, 17, 1-12.
Douglas, Mary (1975). Jokes. In: Implicit Meanings: Essays in Anthropology, 90$114. London:Routledge.
Davies, Ch (2007). Humour and protest: Jokes under communism. International Reviewof Social History 52: 291$305.
Davies, Ch (1982). Ethnic jokes, moral values, and social boundaries. British Journal ofSociology 33 (3): 383$403.
Freud, S. (1905). Jokes and their Relation to the Unconscious, translated by James Strachey. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Forghani, M M; Abdi, Isa. (2016). Representation of women in gender jokes; Critical Discourse Analysis of Gender Jokes about Women on the Mobile Network, Quarterly Journal of Cultural Studies and Communication, Vol. 17, No. 33: 52-31. [in Persian]
Forghani, M M; Mohajeri, R. (2018). The relationship between the use of virtual social networks and changes in youth lifestyles, Quarterly Journal of Modern Media Studies, Fourth Year, No. 13: 259-292. [in Persian]
Groch A. S. (1974). Generality of response to humor and wit in cartoons, jokes, stories and photographs. Psychol. Rep. 35 835–838. 10.2466/pr0.1974.35.2.835
Hosseini Pakdehi, A; Haj Mohammadi, M. (2011). “Adolescents and Mobile Phones”, Social Sciences Quarterly, No. 55: 244-281. [in Persian]
Hughes, Melissa. (2010). Through the looking class racialjokes. Social context and the reasonable.
Naghdipur, bakhityar. (2014). A socioihguistic perspective. Article in folkore. Estonia. Doi: 10, 7592.
J Milner Davis (2016). "Satire and its constraints Case studies from Australia Japan and the Peoples Republic of China". HUMOR 29 (2): 197–221
Karami, Mohammad Hussein; Riahi Zamin, Zahra; Dehghanian, Javad. (2009). Research in the theory and function of constitutional humor. Journal of Persian Language and Literature Research, University of Isfahan, No. 1: 16-1. [in Persian]
Klaus, K. (2018). an introduction to its methodology, Translated by Houshang Naeini, Tehran: Nashreney. [in Persian]
Kowsari, Massoud; Khairkhah, Tahereh. (2008). Content Analysis of Short Messages of Tehran University Students, Cultural Research Quarterly, No. 2. [in Persian]
Martin R. A. (2014). “Humor and gender: an overview of psychological research, ” in Gender and Humor: Interdisciplinary and International Perspectives, eds Chiaro D, Baccolini R, editors. (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter;).
Moghadas, A A; Ghodrati, Shafieh. (2011). A Critical Investigation of Jonathan Turner, Theodore Kemper and Edward Lawler's Theories of Emotion, Journal of Applied Sociology, Volume 22: 166-143. [in Persian]
Momeni Rad, A et al. (2013). Qualitative Content Analysis in Research Procedure: The Nature, Stages and Validity of Results" Educational Measurement Quarterly, Fourth Year, No. 14. [in Persian]
Moradi, Sh; Naderi, N. (2016). Study of the effects of new media consumption on the entrepreneurial intention of students in the case study of the University of Tehran. Quarterly Journal of New Media Studies, Second Year, No. 5. [in Persian]
Morrill, John. (2013). Philosophy of humor, translated by Mahmoud Farjami and Daniel Jafari, Tehran: Nashreney. [in Persian]
Nawal Fadhil Abbas (2019) Humor in TV Talk Shows International Journal of English Linguistics; Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education. ISSN 1923-869X E-ISSN 1923-8703
Nour Mohammadi, M. (2017). The Role of New Media in Resolving International Conflicts, Journal of New Media Studies, Third Year, No. 11: 94-61. [in Persian]
Poindeh, M J. (1998). An Introduction to the Sociology of Literature, Tehran: Naghsh Jahan Publications. [in Persian]
Quivy, R; Luc Van Campenhoudt. (1999). Research Method in Behavioral Sciences, translated by Abdolhossein Nikgohar, Tehran: Totia. [in Persian]
Rabbani Khorasgani, Ali; Kianpour, Massoud (2009). Sociology of Emotions, Quarterly Journal of Applied Sociology, 20th Year, No. 2: 64-35. [in Persian]
Rapp, A. (1951). The Origin of Wit and Humor, New York.
Shaw, B. (2005).. Laugh theory. www.amazon.com/Humo Krichtafovitch/dp/1598002228.
Shifman, lomor, coleman, Stephen, kalz, Elinu (2007). only joking?online humor in the 2005 genral elrct, information community and society 10(4).
Sveinung Sandberg and S_ebastien Tutenges (2019). Laughter in Stories of Crime and Tragedy: The Importance of Humor for Marginalized Populations. Social Problems, 2018, 0, 1–16 doi: 10.1093/socpro/spy019.
Tavakoli Rad, M; Ghaffari, Gh. (2016). Black Jokes, Social Interaction and Its Non-Constructive Consequences. Quarterly Journal of Social Studies and Research in Iran, No. 5: 539-615. [in Persian]
Torbati, S; Mahdavi, A. (2018). Critical Discourse Analysis of Nuclear Agreements Jokes The Nuclear Agreement Representation in Persian Jokes, Quarterly Journal of New Media Studies. Fourth Year, No. 15:106-140. [in Persian]
Tian F, Hou Y, Zhu W, Dietrich A, Zhang Q, Yang W, Chen Q, Sun J, Jiang Q, Cao G (2017). Getting the Joke: Insight during Humor Comprehension - Evidence from an fMRI Study. 18;8:1835. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01835.
Zijderveld, A (‌‌1983). Trend Report: The Sociology of Humour and Laughter”, Current Sociology, 31 (3), pp. 1-5