نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار جامعه‌شناسی، گروه جامعه‌شناسی و مطالعات فرهنگی، دانشگاه ایلام، ایلام، ایران

2 دانشیار جامعه‌شناسی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی تهران. تهران، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری جامعه‌شناسی، پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی تهران. تهران، ایران.

4 دکتری مدیریت آموزشی، سازمان بهزیستی استان ایلام. ایلام، ایران‏

چکیده

 
هدف این ‏پژوهش، شناسایی دلایل و پیامدهای تجربه‌ی خشونت در زندگی زنان خشونت‌دیده است. این پژوهش در ‏قلمرو پارادایم کیفی و مبتنی بر روش نظریه‌ی زمینه‌ای است. جامعه‌ی هدف تحقیق زنان خشونت‌دیده‌ی مراجعه‌کننده به ‏اورژانس اجتماعی و مراکز مثبت زندگی سازمان بهزیستی شهر ایلام است که نمونه‌ای 24 نفره از آنان با استفاده از روش‌های نمونه‌گیری هدفمند ‏و نمونه‌گیری نظری انتخاب ‏شده است. داده‌ها از طریق مصاحبه‌ی ‏نیمه‌ساختاریافته گردآوری‌شده و سپس کدگذاری شده‌اند. یافته‌ها ‏حاکی از نقش عوامل اجتماعی همچون خشونت‌ ‏آموخته‌شده، شیوه‌های ‏مسئله‌ساز ‏ازدواج، خانواده‌ی ‏غیرحامی؛ عوامل ‏اجتماعی فرسایش سرمایه‌ی اجتماعی، انگاره‌ی ‏مردسالارانه؛ عوامل اقتصادی نظیر نابسندگی معیشتی؛ و عوامل بین ‏فردی و مداخله‌ای نظیر کژتابی دوسویه است. واکنش‌های زنان عمدتاً انفعالی بوده و پیامد آن ‏معمول‌پند‌اری نقش قربانی برای زنان بوده است. مقوله‌ی هسته‌ی خشونت خانگی علیه زنان محصول «برهم‌کنش تجربه‌ی ‏محرومیت‌های اقتصادی زنان و انگاره‌ی مردسالاری در جامعه‌ی سرزنشگر قربانی» است که حاصل مدیریت خانواده در ‏بستر حفظ کارکردهای فرهنگ مردسالارانه در کنار انتقال ساختاری خشونت در سازوکاری فرهنگی است. ‏

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Domestic Violence Against Women Generated through Incompatibility of Institutional ‎Interaction

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Feizolahi 1
  • Somayeh sadat Shafiei 2
  • khalil kamarbeigi 3
  • Zahra Raiisi 4

1 Assistant Professor of Sociology, Department of Sociology and cultural studies, Ilam University, ‎Ilam, Iran

2 Associate Professor of Sociology, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. Tehran, Iran

3 PhD Candidate of Sociology, Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. Tehran, Iran

4 PhD in Educational Management, State Welfare Organization, Ilam, Iran‎

چکیده [English]

 
The purpose of this study is to identify the reasons and consequences of ‎experiencing violence in the lives of battered women. The research is qualitative and ‎based on the method of grounded theory. The target population of the research is the battered ‎women who refer to the social emergency of the Behzisti⸴s organization of Ilam city, and a sample ‎of 24 of them has been selected using the purposive sampling method. Data were ‎collected through semi-structured interviews and then coding. Findings indicate the role of familial factors such as learned violence, problematic ‎marriage practices; Social and Economical factors; and intervening factors such as mutual infidelity and deviancy have ‎been two-way. Women's reactions are mainly actions containing passivity, and the usual ‎perception of the role of a continuous victim for women is its consequence. The core category of ‎‎"domestic violence against women is the product of the interaction of women's experience of ‎economic deprivation and the social structure of men's idea of patriarchy" which is the result of ‎family management in the context of maintaining the functions of patriarchal culture along with ‎the structural transmission of violence in the cultural mechanism.
Keywords: Domestic Violence, Patriarchal Culture, Aggrieved Woman, Ilam.
 
 

Introduction

The domestic violence against women has had a history in society in during of centuries. Thus domestic violence against women is one of the social issues that can be seen in all societies and numerous reports have confirmed this issue in Iran as well. in general, it has affected the institution of the family and the society. but it has been discussed mainly as a social issue in the last century. “Typically, social problems have been thought of as social situations that a large number of observers felt were inappropriate and needed remedying” (Eitzen, Zinn and Smith, 2012:9(.
Some theories consider the subject of domestic violence to be problematic as a modern matter and consider it to be a problem arising from the perception and understanding of the society and important social groups of its problematic nature. The researches conducted in recent years about the different types of violence indicate that domestic violence against women is problematic. the main goal of this research is to understand the phenomenon of domestic violence from the perspective of women who have experienced violence. Therefore, the research questions revolve around the subject under which causal conditions and contexts have the subjects been victims of spousal violence? What strategies did they used to deal with these violent acts and what consequences did bring to them?

Literature Review

The theories and theoretical concepts whose main core is to explain the matter of violence against women can be grouped into two main categories: some of them have emphasized the individual characteristics of perpetrators and victims of violence, and others have emphasized the structural characteristics of society. In this research, the following concepts have been selected to create theoretical sensitivity: resources and power imbalance; blaming the victim‏‏ (‏Gracia & Tomás, 2014‎‏), learned violence (Jasinski,2001), the ideology of male dominance (Goode, 1971: quoted by Kim and Sung, 2000), feminist perspective (Renzetti, Edleson & Bergen, 2001), exchange theory (Turner, 2014), The Battered Woman Syndrome (Walker:1984), the concepts of forced control (Stark, 2007), resource imbalance, dependence and bargaining power (Kim and Gray, 2008) have been selected and have been considered in the analysis of research findings.

Methodology

The research is qualitative and ‎based on the method of grounded theory. The target population of the research is the battered ‎women who refer to the social emergency of the Behzistis organization of Ilam city, and a sample ‎of 24 of them has been selected using the purposive sampling method. Acceptability criteria has been used for validation and being trustworthy was achieved through auditing method. Data were ‎collected through semi-structured interviews and then coding.

Results

Findings indicate the role of familial factors such as learned violence, problematic ‎marriage practices, Lack of familial support; Social factors such as the ‎patriarchal image, erosion of social capital; Economic factors such as coincidence of Livelihood ‎hardships; and intervening factors such as Interference of others, mutual infidelity and deviancy have ‎been two-way. Women's reactions are mainly actions containing passivity, and Victimization of children, scared life and usual ‎perception of the role of a victim for women is its consequence.

Conclusion

The result of the process of domestic violence against women can be analyzed under the title "Domestic violence against women is a product of the incompatibility of the institutional interaction caused by the experience of economic deprivation of women and the social structure of patriarchy in the victim-blaming society". The incompatibility of institutional interaction indicates the malfunctioning of the social institutions of the family, economy and cultural system in the target society of the study. In other words, when the patriarchal postulate mixes with the lived experience of women's economic deprivation and immingled with the cultural approach of blaming the victim society, it causes the situational violence against women to be ignored. In addition, it should be noted that such a phenomenon occurs in a society where tradition and modernity are continuously interacting with each other. Tradition and modernity are co-integrated in this society in such a way that they form an interwoven mosaic society that is experiencing the challenges of modernization and types of individualization. The permanence and stability of the idea of ​​patriarchy in this society is rooted in the way that women in such a society link traditional expectations with modern life. In other words, this particular type of social and cultural structure as well as women's selective strategies against domestic violence, along with the destructive consequences of violence on women's lives, leads to continuation of the cultural foundations of accepting domestic violence against women.
 
 
 
 


کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Domestic Violence
  • Patriarchal Culture
  • Aggrieved Woman
  • Ilam
 
Abbasi Aghdam, H., Sabouri Khosroshahi, H., & Hashemzehi, N. (2022). Sociological study of domestic violence against women with emphasis on lived experience (Case study: Women referring to Social Emergency Center). Islamic Life Style, 6(2), 612-621. [In Persian].
Ahmadi Gohari, M., Baneshi, M. R., Zolala, F., Garrusi, B., Salarpour, E., & Samari, M. (2023). Prevalence of domestic violence against women and its visibility in Southeast Iran. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 52(3), 646–654. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v52i3.12147
AllahNouri, A., Karam Pour, R., & Ghasemi, Z. (2022). Examining the lived experiences of violence in families of the older generation (Couples over 50 years old). Journal of Applied Family Therapy, 3(3), 322-338. https://doi.org/10.22034/aftj.2022.336684.1514 [In Persian].
Andersen, M. L., & Witham, D. H. (2011). Thinking about women: Sociological perspectives on sex and gender. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson.
Bagrazaei, P. (2019). Sociological study of the causes and contexts of domestic violence against women with emphasis on social capital. Scientific and Cultural Educational Journal of Women and Family, 14(49), 176-147. [In Persian].
Bagrezaei, P., Zanjani, H., & Seifollahi, S. (2017). The qualitative study of domestic violence against women (Case study: Women referring to the social emergency services in Ilam City). Journal of Iranian Social Studies, 11(0), 5-32.
Basar, F., & Demirci, N. (2018). Domestic violence against women in Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 34(3), 1-6.
Battacherjee, A. (2012). Social science research: Principles, methods, and practices. USF Tampa Bay Open Access Textbooks Collection. Book 3.
Chang, E. C., D’Zurilla, T. J., & Sanna, L. J. (Eds.). (2004). Social problem solving: Theory, research, and training. American Psychological Association.
Dabaghi, N., Amini‐Rarani, M., & Nosratabadi, M. (2023). Investigating the relationship between socioeconomic status and domestic violence against women in Isfahan, Iran in 2021: A cross‐sectional study. Health Science Reports, 6(5), e1277.
Dastranj, M. (2023). Investigating the factors affecting violence against women (The case study: Women of Bandar Abbas city). Quarterly of Order & Security Guards, 16(2), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.22034/osra.2023.1273230.1594 [In Persian].
Eitzen, D. S., Zinn, M. B., & Smith, K. E. (2012). Social problems. Pearson Education, Inc.
Feizolahi, A., & Kamarbeigi, K. (2021). Identifying and prioritizing the social problems and harms in Ilam Province. Socio-Cultural Strategy, 10(2), 287-317.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (3rd ed., translated by Hadi Jalili). Tehran: Nashre Ney.
Foroughzadeh, S., Shariati Mazinani, S., & Akaberi, K. (2023). Women’s experience of domestic violence: A phenomenological study (Case study: Women living in the informal settlement of Al-Timur, Mashhad). Women’s Studies Sociological and Psychological, (in press). https://doi.org/10.22051/jwsps.2022.40179.2620 [In Persian].
Gelles, R. J. (1983). An exchange/social theory. In The dark side of families: Current family violence research (pp. 151-165).
Gelles, R. J. (2005). Violence in the family. In W. Heitmeyer & H. Hagan (Eds.), International handbook of violence research (pp. 1-18). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Gholami, A., Sodani, M., Farhadirad, H., & Khojastehmehr, R. (2018). Analyzing factors affecting violence against married women in Ahvaz: A qualitative research. Sociological Researches, 12(1.2), 117-155. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02483-0
Hooshmand, M., Roshanaei, A., & Motlagh, M. (2023). Sociological explanation of factors affecting family violence with the grounded theory approach. Journal of Applied Family Therapy, 4(5), 378-396. https://doi.org/10.22034/aftj.2023.370411.1828
Ince-Yenilmez, M. (2022). The role of socioeconomic factors on women’s risk of being exposed to intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(9–10), NP6084–NP6111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520966668
Jafari, Z., & Parvin, F. (2022). An overview of types of violence against women in Iran between 2010 and 2021. Nursing and Midwifery Journal, 20(4), 269-279. http://unmf.umsu.ac.ir/article-1-4666-fa.html [In Persian].
Jasinski, J. L. (2001). Theoretical explanations for violence against women. In C. M. Renzetti, J. L. Edleson, & R. K. Bergen (Eds.), Sourcebook on violence against women (pp. 1-24). Sage Publishers.
Kerman, K. T., & Betrus, P. (2020). Violence against women in Turkey: A social ecological framework of determinants and prevention strategies. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 21(3), 510-526.
Kim, J. Y., & Sung, K. (2000). Conjugal violence in Korean American families: A residue of the cultural tradition. Journal of Family Violence, 15(4), 331–345.
Kim, L., & Gray, K. A. (2008). Leave or stay? Battered women’s decision after intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(10), 1465–1482.
Koochani Esfahani, M., Nosrati Nejad, F., Seddighi, H., Namazi, A., & Rameshgar, H. (2022). A sociological study of domestic violence against women in Iran: A narrative review. Journal of Social Continuity and Change (JSCC), 1(2), 399-416. https://doi.org/10.22034/jscc.2022.2797 [In Persian].
Macionis, J. J. (2012). Social problems (4th ed.). Pearson Education, Inc.
Manzouri, L., & Abed, M. (2023). Prevalence of domestic violence and its related factors in married women aged 18-49 years in Yasuj, Iran. Armaghan, 28(3), 386-399. [In Persian].
Menati, R., Menati, W., Kassani, A., & Delpisheh, A. (2013). Examination of prevalence of domestic violence and related factors among women in Ilam city. Life Science Journal, 10(3), 1132-57.
Mills, C. W. (2000). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press. (Original work published 1959).
Mirzaei, E., Mohamadi, F., & Feizolahi, A. (2020). Sociological study on the extent of violence against women in the family and its effective factors (Case study: Kermanshah city). Quarterly Journal of Woman and Society, 11(43), 279-322. [In Persian].
Mirzaei, M., & Nazarzadeh, M. (2020). Investigating the causes of increasing domestic violence against women during the domestic quarantine days of the corona pandemic and using strategies to achieve women’s citizenship rights in the post-corona days (Case study: Women in Ilam). Law of Nations Journal, 7(28), 311. [In Persian].
Moshtagh, M., Amiri, R., Sharafi, S., & Arab-Zozani, M. (2023). Intimate partner violence in the Middle East region: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(2), 613-631. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211036060
Nwosu, L. N. (2020). The experience of domestic violence among Nigerian-Canadian women in Toronto. Canadian Woman Studies, 25(1-2), 99-106.
Okolie, I. S., Mohammed, Z. K., & Ononye, U. (2021). Domestic violence against women in Maiduguri Borno State, Nigeria. Journal of Humanities and Social Policy, 7(1), 23-35.
Pourdel, M., & Abbaspour, Z. (2019). Comparison of types of violence against urban and rural women. Applied Research in Consulting, 1(3), 69-82. [In Persian].
Rahimian, J., & Jahanbani, Z. (2023). Critical discourse analysis in the narratives of women under domestic violence based on Van Leeuwen’s social actors (2008). ZABANPAZHUHI (Journal of Language Research), 15(46), 85-110.
Renzetti, C. M., Edleson, J. L., & Bergen, R. K. (2001). Sourcebook on violence against women. Sage Publishers.
Rezaeinasab, Z., Feizolahi, A., & Keshavarz, M. (2023). Virtual networks and the breakup of married life: A qualitative study of the lived experience of divorced women of Ilam. Woman in Development & Politics, 21(2), 445-479. https://doi.org/10.22051/jwdp.2022.350229.1008270
Rezaienasab, Z. (2021). The process of divorce formation among divorced women in Ilam. Social Problems of Iran, 12(1), 299-332. https://doi.org/10.52547/jspi.12.1.299
Rubington, E., & Weinberg, M. (2003). The study of social problems: Seven perspectives (2nd ed.). Tehran University Publication.
Saadati, M., & Pourali Manjili, F. (2023). Sociological study of the mediating role of cultural capital in the relationship between economic capital and domestic violence against women. Women’s Studies Sociological and Psychological, 21(4), (in press). https://doi.org/10.22051/jwsps.2023.42301.2701 [In Persian].
Shayestefar, M., Saffari, M., Gholamhosseinzadeh, R., et al. (2023). A qualitative quantitative mixed methods study of domestic violence against women. BMC Women’s Health, 23, 322.
Stark, E. (2007). Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford University Press.
Statistical Centre of Iran. (2020). Salnameh-amari. Tehran. https://amar.org.ir/salnamehamari/agentType/ViewSearch/CustomFieldIDs/65/SearchValues/1399
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2018). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for grounded theory (translated by E. Afshar). Nashre Ney. [In Persian].
Tripathi, P., Dwivedi, P. S., & Sharma, S. (2022). Domestic violence against women during the COVID-19: A case study of Bihar (India). Journal of International Women’s Studies, 24(5), Article 5.
Turner, J. H. (2014). Contemporary sociological theory (translated by A. A. Moqadas). Tehran: Jameeshenasan. [In Persian].
United Nations. (1993). Declaration on the elimination of violence against women. United Nations: New York, NY.
Wang, Z., & Sekiyama, T. (2023). Domestic violence victimization among Chinese women and its relevance to their economic power. Frontiers in Sociology, 8, 1178673. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1178673
Wijesekara, M. (2022). Domestic violence against women in Sri Lanka during COVID-19 lockdown period and social work intervention. E-Journal of Social Work, 6(1), 22-29.
World Health Organization. (2018). Addressing violence against women: Key achievements and priorities. Retrieved from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/275982
 
 
استناد به این مقاله: فیض‌اللهی، علی.، شفیعی، سمیه‌سادات.، کمربیگی، خلیل.، رییسی، زهرا. (1402). خشونت خانگی علیه زنان؛ محصول ناسازوارگی برهم‌کنش نهادی، فصلنامه علوم اجتماعی، 30(103)، 1-39.   DOI: 10.22054/qjss.2024.77792.2746
 Social sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License...