Which interpretation of quantum theory is appropriate for social sciences?

Moradi, Abozar

doi:10.22054/qjss.2025.81925.2831

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

abozar moradi

Assistant Professor, Faculty of Science, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22054/qjss.2025.81925.2831

Abstract

In this article, the different interpretations of the quantum theory are introduced, in order to determine which one more suitable for its expansion into the field of social sciences. The main criterion for judging the appropriateness of is its ability to explain the relationship between the intentional actions of individuals and the social reality as a common concept by reviewing the body-mind relationship. It is argued that instrumentalist and materialist ontological interpretations of quantum mechanics are not suitable for this purpose; as they do not leave room for subjectivity as a physical phenomenon with a causal power different from matter. Another case is the third-person subjectivist interpretation, in which the observer’s agency cause the collapse of the wave function. Considering that the main challenge in social sciences is the intentional actions of individuals participating in the formation of that phenomenon, it is also does not have the desired characteristic. Instead, it is proposed that the combination of the Boehm and Primas interpretations of the quantum theory is more suitable for the expansion into social sciences. These interpretations attribute primitive mentality and self-awareness to particles at the fundamental level, allowing for consideration of a causal power different from matter for mentality.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Methodology of Social Sciences

References

Akrivoulis, Dimitrios E. (2002). The Quantum Politics Metaphor in International Relations: Revising "American Newtonianism". Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in International Relations, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Kent at Canterbury.

Atmanspcher, Harald. And Thomas Filk. (2014). “Non-Commutative Operations in Consciousness Studies”. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 21(3-4), 24-39.

Al-Khalili, Jim, and John J. Mcfadden. (2014). Life on the Edge:The Coming of Age of Quantum Biology. London, Bantam Press.

Barad, Karen. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway; Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Becker, Theodore L. (1991). Quantum Politics: Applying Quantum Theory to Political Phenomena. New York: Praeger.

Berkovitz, Joseph. (2014). Action at a Distance in Quantum Mechanics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Bohm, David. (1951). Quantum Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Bowman, Marcus. (2018). Quantum Politics: Beyond the Simple Left-Right Political Spectrum. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 126 pp.

Busemeyer, Jerome, and Peter Bruza. (2014). Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision. Cambridge University Press.

Chichilnisky, Graciela. (2022). “The Topology of Quantum Theory and Social Science”. Quantum Report,4,201-220.

Dolphijn, Rick, and Iris V. D. Tuin. (2012). New Materialism: Interviews and Cartographies. Open Humanities Press, An imprint of Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library.

Girardi, Giancarlo. (2002). “Making Quantum Theory Compatible with Realism”. Foundations of Science, 7, 11-42.

Haven, Emmanuel, Andrei Khrennikov. (2013). Quantum Social Science. Cambridge University Press.

Haven, Emmanuel, Andrei Khrennikov, Chenghu Ma, and sandro Sozzo. (2018). “Introduction to quantum probability theory and its economic applications”. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 78: 127-130.

Höne, Katharina E. (2017). Quantum Social Science. Oxford University Press.

Kauffman, A.S. and Roli, A. (2023), “ What is Consciousness? Artificial Intelligence, real Intelligence, Quantum Mind and Qualia”, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139, 530–538.

Kazmi, Ali Asghar. (2015). “Quantum Politics New Methodological Perspective”. International Studies Journal, 45(12).

Kim, Gaon, and Eung W. Nho. (2019). “A Review of Quantum Games”. Journal of Young Investigators, 37(2).

Kovalenko, Tatyana, Sabine Vincent, Vyacheslav Yukalov, and Didier Sornette. (2023). “Calibration of quantum decision theory: aversion to large losses and predictability of probabilistic Choices”. J. Phys. Complex. 4.

Laloe, Frank. (2001). “Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics?”. American Journal of Physics, 69(6), 655-701.

Mansoori, Isa. (2025). “Development as Consciousness: An Introduction to a New Epistemology. Toward a Logic for Economic Practices”. www. Econstor.com.

Orrell, David. (2018). Quantum economics: The new science of money. Icon Books.

Orrell, David. (2020). “The value of value: A quantum approach to economics, security and international relation”. Security Dialogue,51(5): 482–498.

Orrell, David. (2021). A Quantum Walk Model of Financial Options. Wilmott, 2021: 62-69.

Ranalli, Christopher, and Rene Van Woudenberg. (2021). “Collective Ignorance: An Information Theoretic Account”. Synthese,198,4731–4750.

Price, Huw. (2012). “Does Time-Symmetry Imply Retro Causality? How the Quantum World Says Maybe”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 43(2), 75-83.

Primas, Hans. (2003). “Time-Entanglement Between Mind and Matter”. Mind and Matter, 5(1), 7-44.

Primas, Hans. (2007). “Non-Boolan Descriptions For Mind- Matter Problems”. Mind and Matter, 5(1), 7- 44.

Primas, Hans. (2009). Complementarity of Mind and Matter Problems. Recasting Reality, Berlin: Springer Verlag, 171-209.

Wendt, Alxander. (2015). Quantum Mind and Social Science: Unifying Physical and Social Ontology. Cambridge University Press.

Wendt, Alexander, and James D. Drian. (2022). Quantum Intrnational Relations: a Human Science for World Politics. Oxford Univrsity Press.

Yukalov, Vyacheslav, and Didier Sornette. (2016). “Quantum Probability and Quantum decision-making”. Philosophical Transaction A, 374.

Which interpretation of quantum theory is appropriate for social sciences?

References

References

Volume 31, Issue 107 - Serial Number 107December 2024Pages 203-243

Volume 31, Issue 107 - Serial Number 107
December 2024
Pages 203-243