Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Professor of Sociology, Allameh Tabataba’i University

2 PhD Candidate of Sociology, Allameh Tabataba’i University (corresponding author)

Abstract

Each form of religiousness grows at the heart of a “religious society”, and a “religious” society is always to some extent organized. In the “sociology of religion”, the study of social dynamics related to the religious society is defined under the concept of “religious organization”. From long ago, one of the concerns of sociology of religion has been to study and understand the various methods of organization in religious societies. Through an analytical-descriptive study of different approaches and the transformations in this field, the present paper aims to extract “the main criteria” of these typologies. Extracting “the main criteria” would familiarize us with the logic of these typologies, and it shall contribute to presenting alternative, domestic typologies in the framework of Islamic tradition. Therefore, the method of research is documentary, and the main purpose of the study is to understand the fundamental dynamics of the typologies of mystical organizations in theoretical literature. With this purpose in mind, we have examined the available literature through two general approaches: a) a formal approach to the typology of religious organizations; and b) a quantitative approach to the typology of religious organizations. The formal approach is mainly based on Weber’s theories, however, the quantitative approach has been put forth in critique of the formal approach. By studying various typologies and their theoretical principles, we see that the two criteria of a) the extent of organization and b) the extent of tension against the host culture enjoy central importance in the typology of religious organizations.

Keywords

Main Subjects

-    اسپیلکا، برنارد و دیگران (1390). روان‌شناسی دین، براساس رویکرد تجربی، تهران: رشد.
-    جنکینز، ریچارد (1391). هویت اجتماعی، ترجمه: تورج یارمحمدی، تهران: پردیش دانش.
-   حاجیانی، ابراهیم (1383). «بررسی جامعه‌شناختی فرقه‌گرایی مذهبی و تأثیر آن بر نظم و ثبات سیاسی»، مطالعات راهبردی، تابستان 1383، ش. 24.
-    دورکیم، امیل (1393). صور بنیانی حیات دینی، ترجمه: باقر پرهام، تهران: مرکز.
-   ریتزر، جورج (1393). نظریه جامعه‌شناسی، ترجمه: هوشنگ نایبی، تهران: نی.
-    صبوری، منوچهر (1384). جامعه‌شناسی سازمان‌ها، تهران: شب تاب.
-   طالبی دارابی، باقر (1390). «گونه‌شناسی سازمان‌های دینی»، مطالعات معنوی، شماره 1.
-   کوزر، لیوئیس (1392). زندگی و اندیشۀ بزرگان جامعه‌شناسی، ترجمه: محسن ثلاثی، تهران: انتشارات علمی.
-   گیدنز، آنتونی و کارن بردسال (1386). جامعه‌شناسی، ترجمه: حسن چاوشیان، تهران: نشر نی.
-   گیدنز، آنتونی (1388). دورکیم، ترجمه: یوسف اباذری، تهران: خوارزمی.
-   وبر، ماکس (1374). اقتصاد و جامعه، ترجمه: عباس منوچهری، مهرداد ترابی‌نژاد و مصطفی عالم‌زاده، تهران: مولی.
-   وبر، ماکس (1389). «قدرت و سلطه»، عقلانیت و آزادی؛ مقالاتی از ماکس وبر و دربارۀ ماکس وبر (مجموعه مقالات)، ترجمه: یدالله موقن و احمد تدین، تهران: هرمس.
-   وبر، ماکس (1392). دین، قدرت، جامعه، ترجمه: احمد تدین، تهران: هرمس.
-   ویرهوف، پ. ه. و دیگران (1389). مقدمه‌ای بر پژوهش دین عامیانه، ترجمه: ابراهیم موسی پور، تهران: جوانه توس.
-   همیلتون، ملکم (1387). جامعه‌شناسی دین، ترجمه: محسن ثلاثی، تهران: نشر ثالث.
 
-   Aldridge, Alan (2000). Religion in the Contemporary World; a Sociological Introduction, Oxford: Polity Press.
-   Bainbridge, W.S and Rodney Stark (1980). “Client and Audience Cults in America”, Sociological Analysis, 41(3): 199- 214.
-   Becker, Howard (1932). Systematic Sociology on the Basis of the Beziehungslehre and Gebildelehre of Leopold van Wiese, New York: Wiley.
-   Daiber, Karl-Fritz (2002). Mysticism: Troeltsch’s Third Type of Religious Collectivities, Social Compass, No. 49 (3). P: 329-341.
-   Finke, Roger & Rodney Stark (2001). “The New Holy Clubs: Testing Church-to-Sect Propositions”, Sociology of Religion, 62 (2): 175- 189.
-   Furseth, Inger and Pal Repstad (2006). An Introduction to the Sociology of Religion; Classical and Contemporary Perspectives, Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
-   Goldstein, Warren S. (2011). “The dialectics of religious conflict: Church-Sect, denomination and the culture wars”, Committee on the Study of Religion, Harvard University, Center for Critical Research on Religion, MA, USA, Published online: 31 Mar.
-   Johnson, Benton (1957). “A Critical Appraisal of the church-sect Typology”, American Sociological Review, 22 (1): 88- 92.
-   Johnson, Benton (1963). “On Church and Sect”, American Sociological Review, 28 (4): 539- 549.
-   Johnson, Benton (1971). “Church and Sect Revisited”, Journal for Scientific Study of Religion, 10 (2): 124-137.
-   Mandal, Bindeshwari Pd. (2012). Social Organization and Community, New Castle: NYX ACADEMICS LLC.
-   Murphy­-Geissa, Gail E. & Dana Rosenfeld & Lara Foleyc (2010). “Midwifery as established sect: an expanded applicationof the church­-sect continuum”, Community, Work & Family, 13 (1): 101- 122.
-   Niebuhr, H. Richard (1957). The social sources of denominationalism, New York: Henry Holt and Co.
-   Ritzer, George (2008). Classical Sociological Theory, New York: Mc-Hill.
-   Ritzer, George (2010). Sociological Theory, New York: Mc-Hill.
-   Stark, Rodney & W.S. Bainbridge (1979). “Of Churches, Sects, and Cults: Preliminary Concepts for a Theory of Religious Movements”, Scientific Study of Religion, 18 (2): 117- 131.
-   Stark, Rodney & W.S. Bainbridge & Daniel P. Doyle (1979). “Cults of America: A Reconnaissance in Space and Time”, Sociological Analysis, 40 (4): 347- 359.
-   Stark, Rodney & Eva Hamberg & Alan S. Miller (2005). “Exploring Spirituality and Unchurched Religions in America, Sweden, and Japan”, Journal of Contemporary Religion, 20 (1): 3- 23.
-   Yinger, J. M. (1970). The Scientific Study of religion, London: Collier-Macmillan.