Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Sociology PhD Candidate, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Meritocracy, as a fundamental principle for the equitable distribution of opportunities and resources, faces complex challenges in Iran, rooted in structural inequalities, power structures, and socio-cultural dynamics. Utilizing qualitative thematic meta-analysis, this study examines the findings of 30 domestic articles (2001-2025) to analyze meritocracy through three structural themes: (1) Structural Inequalities, (2) Power Structures, and (3) Socio-Cultural Dynamics. The methodology involved open, axial, and selective coding of both facilitating factors and obstructive barriers, organized at a structural level. Within these 30 articles, 93 macro-level facilitating factors and 103 obstructive barriers were identified.

The findings reveal that structural inequalities operate unilaterally and negatively, restricting equal access. Power structures are dualistic in nature, yet obstructive barriers within them are predominant, undermining transparency. Similarly, socio-cultural dynamics exhibit duality, but relationship-centric tendencies are dominant, diminishing the motivation for individual effort. The interaction of barriers across these three themes—particularly those of economic inequality, power concentration, and favoritism (parit-bazi)—creates a negative feedback loop. This loop severely constrains meritocracy and impedes the realization of social justice.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Andersen, David. D. E. (2018). "Does Meritocracy Lead to Bureaucratic Quality? Revisiting the Experience of Prussia and Imperial and Weimar Germany." Social Science History, 1–24.
Andersen, David. D. E. (2021). "The Limits of Meritocracy in Stabilizing Democracy and the Twin Importance of Bureaucratic Impartiality and Effectiveness." Social Science History, 1–25.
Atria, Jorge., Castillo, Juan Carlos., Maldonado, Luis and Ramírez, Simón. (2019). "Studying Meritocracy in an Unequal Context: Perspectives from Chilean Scholars." UNIVERSUM · Vol. 34 · N 2 · Universidad de Talca. Pp. 127 – 145.
Bourdieu, Pierre, and Passeron.Jean-Claude. (1990). "Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture" (Vol. 4). Sage.
Braun, Virginia, and Clarke. Victoria. (2006). "Using thematic analysis in psychology". Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Cambridge Dictionary. (n.d.). "Meritocracy. In Cambridge Dictionary." Retrieved May 7, 2025, from https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/meritocracy.
Dahl, Robert A. (1989). "Democracy and Its Critics". Yale University Press.
Eisenhart, Margaret A, and Howe. Kenneth R. (1992). "Validity in educational research". In M. D. LeCompte, W. L. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 643–680). Academic Press.
Kim, Change.H, and Choi, Yong. B. (2017). "How meritocracy is defined today? Contemporary aspects of meritocracy." Economics & Sociology, 10(1), 112–121.
Lukes, Steven. (2005). "Power: A radical view. "(2nd ed.). Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). "Meritocracy. In Merriam-Webster Dictionary." Retrieved May 7, 2025, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/meritocracy, 7-65.
Oxford Dictionaries. (n.d.). "Meritocracy. In Oxford Dictionaries." Retrieved May 7, 2025, from https://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/meritocracy.
Sandel, Michael. J. (2020). "The Tyranny of Merit: What’s Become of the Common Good?". Translated by S. Norouzi. Tehran: Parse Book Translation and Publishing.
Sen, Amartya. (2000). "Merit and Justice." In K. Arrow, S. Bowles, & S. Durlauf (Eds.), Meritocracy and Economic Inequality (pp. 5–16). Princeton University Press.
Thomas, James, and Harden. Angela. (2008). "Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews." BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8- 45.
Tilly, Charles. (2005). "Historical perspectives on inequality." In M. Romero & E. Margolis (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social inequalities (pp. 15–30). Blackwell Publishing.
Williams, Raymond. (1983). "Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society". (Revised ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1-27.
Young, Michael. (1958). "The Rise of the Meritocracy". Thames & Hudson.