Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Associate Professor of Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

2 PhD Candidate in Theoretical-Cultural Sociology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

10.22054/qjss.2025.89770.2934

Abstract

In contemporary Iran, transgender life is caught in a paradoxical state of “legal acceptance” and “social exclusion.” The dominance of the medical-legal perspective has created a profound gap between “formal knowledge” (based on pathology) and “lived experience.” Thus, this research analyzes the social construction of the transition process within this gap to understand how social actors narrate and experience this path. Conducted within the framework of critical constructivism, the study employs a two-phase qualitative methodology: reflexive thematic analysis of over 100 hours of Persian podcasts and participatory ethnography in Isfahan based on 80 hours of in-depth interviews with 15 transgender individuals and 5 specialists. Findings indicate that while public self-narratives formulate transition in a linear, five-stage model (disruption, translation and naming, institutional bargaining, temporary accommodation, re-creation), field evidence reveals lived reality as continuous structural suspension. Finally, drawing on critical symbolic interactionism, the study argues that this linear model is a symbolic struggle by the subject to impose order on chaos and achieve “legibility”- an effort that, paradoxically, leads to the reproduction of the linear logic desired by formal institutions.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Abu‐Lughod, Lila. (1990). Can there be a feminist ethnography? Women & Performance: a journal of feminist theory, 5(1), 7-27.
Barmania, Sima, & Aljunid, Syed Mohamed. (2017). Transgender women in Malaysia, in the context of HIV and Islam: a qualitative study of stakeholders’ perceptions. BMC international health and human rights, 17(1), 30.
Blumer, Herbert. (1986). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method: Univ of California Press.
Braun, Virginia, & Clarke, Victoria. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health, 11(4), 589-597.
Braun, Virginia, Clarke, Victoria, Hayfield, Nikki, Davey, Louise, & Jenkinson, Elizabeth. (2023). Doing reflexive thematic analysis. In Supporting research in counselling and psychotherapy: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods research (pp. 19-38): Springer.
Brickell, Chris. (2006). The sociological construction of gender and sexuality. The Sociological Review, 54(1), 87-113.
Bull, Michael. (2000). Sounding out the city: Personal stereos and the management of everyday life: Berg.
Burbank, Patricia M, & Martins, Diane C. (2010). Symbolic interactionism and critical perspective: divergent or synergistic? Nursing philosophy, 11(1), 25-41.
Butler, Judith. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection: Stanford University Press.
Butler, Judith. (2002). Gender trouble: routledge.
Carsten, Janet. (2004). After kinship (Vol. 2): Cambridge University Press.
Connell, Raewyn. (2012). Transsexual women and feminist thought: Toward new understanding and new politics. Signs: Journal of women in culture and society, 37(4), 857-881.
Darwin, Helana. (2017). Doing gender beyond the binary: A virtual ethnography. Symbolic Interaction, 40(3), 317-334.
Dickens, Bernard M. (2020). Transsexuality: Legal and ethical challenges. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 151(1), 163-167.
Dodgson, Joan E. (2019). Reflexivity in qualitative research. Journal of human lactation, 35(2), 220-222.
Duggan, Lisa. (2012). The twilight of equality?: Neoliberalism, cultural politics, and the attack on democracy: Beacon Press.
Foucault, Michel. (1982). The subject and power. Critical inquiry, 8(4), 777-795.
Geertz, Clifford. (2017). The interpretation of cultures: Basic books.
IMAGINATIONS, SONIC. (2012). Jonathan Sterne. The Sound Studies Reader, 1.
Mahmood, Saba. (2006). Feminist theory, agency, and the liberatory subject: Some reflections on the Islamic revival in Egypt. Temenos-Nordic Journal for the Study of Religion, 42(1).
Mead, George H, & Schubert, Cornelius. (2018). Mind, self and society: na.
Meltzer, Bernard, Petras, John, & Reynolds, Larry. (2020). Symbolic interactionism (RLE Social Theory): Genesis, varieties and criticism: Routledge.
Moore, Sally Falk. (1973). Law and social change: the semi-autonomous social field as an appropriate subject of study. Law & Society Review, 7(4), 719-746.
Najmabadi, Afsaneh. (2020). Professing selves: Transsexuality and same-sex desire in contemporary Iran: Duke University Press.
Prosser, Jay. (1998). Second skins: The body narratives of transsexuality: Columbia University Press.
Sandoval, Chela. (2013). Methodology of the Oppressed (Vol. 18): U of Minnesota Press.
Schwandt, Thomas A, Lincoln, Yvonna S, & Guba, Egon G. (2007). Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New directions for evaluation, 2007(114).
Snigdha, Rezwana Karim. (2019). An obscure perception of transgender in Islam: A case of Hijra in Bangladesh. Global Journal of Human Social Science Research, 19(5), 29-36.
Spade, Dean. (2015). Normal life: Administrative violence, critical trans politics, and the limits of law: Duke University Press.
Stryker, Susan. (2014). Biopolitics. Transgender Studies Quarterly, 1(1-2), 38-42.
Stryker, Susan. (2017). Transgender history: The roots of today's revolution: Hachette UK.
Valentine, David. (2020). Imagining transgender: An ethnography of a category: Duke University Press.
Zengin, Aslı. (2019). The afterlife of gender: sovereignty, intimacy and Muslim funerals of transgender people in Turkey. Cultural Anthropology, 34(1), 78-102.