Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Tehran Faculty of Social Sciences

10.22054/qjss.2025.75032.2675

Abstract

 
This article employs an archaeological approach, drawing on the concept of "serious speech acts" and Althusser's "problematic," to examine the formation and consolidation of an archaizing discursive order within the cultural policies of the first Pahlavi government. The central question of this research concerns the manifestation and objectification of this discursive order in the cultural policies of that era. Archaizing discourses of Iranian romantic nationalists of the pre-constitutional period, as the prehistory of this discourse, intertwine with post-constitutional nationalist historiography and materialize in the cultural policies of the first Pahlavi era. This discourse, particularly within the two organizations of "Cultivation of Thoughts" and "Iranian Scouting," becomes institutionalized and transforms into a practical model for the cultural policies of the Pahlavi government. The archaizing nationalist discourses, by referencing subjects from Akhundzadeh and Kermani to Pirnia and Pourdavoud, shape the main centers for guiding behaviors and social structures. In this process, the identification of "spiritual malaise" as an impediment to the "education of the nation" and efforts to remedy it through the "cultivation of minds" and the "cultivation of bodies" occur within the framework of strengthening the "spirit of society" and the "forces of the nation." This remedy materializes through the promotion of "patriotism," "loyalty to the Shah," and "God-worship," and the continuous reproduction of these concepts in the form of "moral education," within the context of the archaizing nationalist discursive order.
Keywords: Cultivation of Minds and Bodies, Spiritual Malaise, Education of the Nation, Archaeology, Archaism, Cultivation of Thoughts.
Introduction
Nationalist discourses infused with antiquarianism and racialism, originating from pre-Constitutional intellectuals, were actualized in the First Pahlavi regime's cultural policies. To legitimize itself, the regime employed a "romantic nationalism"—where antiquarianism and racialism were central. This nationalism, emphasizing nostalgia for "Ancient Iran" and othering the "Islamic era," dominated pre-Qajar intellectuals' rhetoric. These discourses, in continuity with nationalist historiography, were actualized, institutionalized, and became the state’s operational paradigm, particularly through the "Organization for Public Mind Cultivation" and the "Iranian Scouting Organization"—key sites for directing behavior. By diagnosing the "malady of the motherland" and advancing "national education" (mental and physical), these discourses were embedded within antiquarian-racialist rhetoric. Aimed at revitalizing the "spirit of society" and "strengthening the nation’s vigor," this process was problematized, and the organizations became arenas for materializing antiquarian discourses. Thus, the formation of an antiquarian discursive order within the First Pahlavi’s cultural policies is rooted in this. This article questions how this order was actualized in the regime's practices via these organizations. Existing scholarship largely identifies the core components of this ideology, but the concretization of this nationalist order, particularly through these institutions, is under-explored. This study demonstrates how antiquarian-racialist discourses—aimed at rejuvenating the "spirit of society"—were problematized as a remedy for a "spiritual malady," achievable through "patriotism" and "loyalty to the Shah," materialized in the rhetoric of these two organizations.
Research Question
How did the antiquarian discursive order within the First Pahlavi's cultural policies, using Foucaultian archaeology and Althusserian problematique, materialize and attain objectivity through the "Organization for Public Mind Cultivation" and the "Iranian Scouting Organization"?
Theoretical-Methodological Framework
This article examines the formation of the archaist discursive order during Reza Shah's reign using Althusser's "problematic" and "epistemological rupture" alongside Foucaultian discourse analysis (archaeology) with four categories: "objects," "enunciative modalities," "formation of concepts," and "formation of strategies." This order, centered on "nation-building," is reflected in "cultivation of minds" and "cultivation of bodies." From an Althusserian view, "problematic" is a network of assumptions enabling certain issues while marginalizing others. Thus, Reza Shah's racial archaist discourse is a product of a problematic where "Aryan race" and "ancient grandeur" become central. "Epistemological rupture" denotes a radical cognitive transformation; here, archaist discourse is analyzed as a rupture from preceding discourses.
Results
This study employs Foucauldian discourse analysis and Althusserian concepts of problematic and epistemological break to examine the racialized ancient-oriented nationalist discourse propagated by the Sazman-e Parvaresh-e Afkar (Organization for the Cultivation of Thoughts) and the Iranian Scouts Organization during Reza Shah’s reign (1925–1941). Key findings include:
1 .Hegemonic Reproduction of Ancient-Oriented Nationalism: Central concepts like "patriotism," "monarchism," and "national cultivation" were discursively constructed to forge a unified identity rooted in pre-Islamic glory, juxtaposed against the "degenerate Islamic era." Cultural institutions naturalized these tropes through lectures, radio programs, and literacy campaigns, framing them as remedies for the "spiritual illness" of Iranian society.

Medicalization of Society: Metaphors of "social pathology" and "therapeutic intervention" merged medical discourse with nationalist ideology, legitimizing state control over citizens’ minds and bodies. Narratives like the "ailing mother" (symbolizing the nation) and the "healing son" (Reza Shah) reinforced the Shah’s role as the savior of Iran’s "degenerate soul."
European Fascist Influences: The organization’s propaganda strategies mirrored European fascist models (e.g., Nazi Germany and Mussolini’s Italy), blending concepts like "national unity" and "leader worship" with reinvented Persian imperial motifs.
Disciplinary Subject-Making: The dual focus on mental cultivation (via ideological indoctrination) and physical discipline (through the Scouts Organization) reflected a shift from punitive to biopolitical governance. Phrases like "monarchism inherent in Iranian blood" or "a healthy body as the foundation of national prosperity" constructed docile subjects aligned with state ideology.
Genealogy of Discourse: This discursive regime drew from 19th-century Romantic nationalism (e.g., Mirza Aqa Khan Kermani) and revisionist historiography by scholars like Pirniya and Nafisi, who ideologically reinterpreted Iran’s past to legitimize Pahlavi modernization projects. By analyzing archival speeches, policies, and institutional practices, this research reveals how the Pahlavi state instrumentalized cultural institutions to impose a hegemonic nationalist narrative, transforming citizens into disciplined subjects of a modernizing authoritarian regime.

Conclusion
This study examined the formation of the archaist discursive order during Reza Shah's reign, aiming at "nation-building," using Althusser's concepts and Foucaultian discourse analysis within four categories, through the "cultivation of minds" and "cultivation of bodies." Regarding objects, "patriotism," "devotion to the Shah," and "nation-building" within "racially archaist discourse" materialized in cultural policies, particularly in the Organization for the Advancement of Thought and the Iranian Scouting Organization, structured through discursive practices. In enunciative modalities, emphasis was on granting speech rights to nation-building cultural figures, organizing cultural institutions, and shifting their policy-making status. These figures, reproducing serious speech acts, shaped subjects' lifeworld. "Competence criteria" linked status to knowledge. Concept formation analysis examined discourse rules and speaker adherence as consolidation mechanisms. Strategy formation analyzed "returning to ancient Iran" as a tool to overcome the "Islamic era." Serious speech acts systematically shaped objects. "Patriotism," "devotion to the Shah," and "theism" in alignment with "nation-building," in these institutions, defined the Pahlavi I era's discursive order, reproduced and stabilized through concept chains. The determination of this order reflects the accumulation of romantic nationalist statements in historians' works, institutionalized in the Pahlavi I state's governance, functioning as a tool for "cultivation of minds" and "embodiment." These discourses, identifying the "spiritual malady" of subjects and attempting to cure it through concepts like "patriotism" and "moral education," problematized societal embodiment. The dominant discourse, through cultural institutions, reconstructed subjects' lifeworlds by strengthening the "spirit of society" and the "forces of the nation." Ultimately, the Pahlavi I state adopted archaist ideology as its directive, prescribing "patriotism" and a "return to ancient grandeur" as cures. This was implemented through institutions to transform society into obedient subjects. However, by marginalizing narratives, this discourse generated tensions within Iran’s cultural fabric, traceable to this day.
 

Keywords

Main Subjects

 
Abdi, K. (2001). Nationalism and the development of archaeology in Iran. Journal of Archaeology, 105(1), 51–76.
Adamiyat, F. (1978). The thoughts of Mirza Agha Khan Kermani (2nd ed.). Payam.
Ajoudani, M. (2008). The Iranian constitutional revolution. Akhtaran.
Amanat, A. (1998). Pourkhaghan and the idea of reclaiming Iranian national history: Jalal al-Din Mirza and Nameh-ye Khosravan. Iran-Nameh, 65.
Ansari, A. M. (2012). The politics of nationalism in modern Iran. Cambridge University Press.
Ashraf, A. (2023). Iranian identity: From ancient times to the end of the Pahlavi era (H. Ahadi, Trans.). Nashr-e Ney.
Atabaki, T. (2002). Azerbaijan and Iranian nationalism. Goftogoo, (9).
Avery, P. (1994). Modern history of Iran (from the foundation of the Pahlavi dynasty to the coup of 1953) (M. Rafi'i Mehrabadi, Trans., Vol. 2). Ataei Publications.
Bashiriyeh, H. (2022). The history of political thought in the 20th century (Vol. 1, 18th ed.). Nashr-e Ney.
Bayat, K. (2009). The Pahlavi school of historiography on the Pahlavi era. In T. Atabaki (Ed.), Iran in the 20th century: Historiography and political culture (pp. XX–XX). I.B. Tauris.
Bigdelo, R. (2001). Archaeological nationalism in modern Iranian history. Nashr-e Markaz.
Darybigi, B. (2003). The Organization for the Cultivation of Thought. Markaz-e Asnad-e Enghelab-e Eslami.
Dean, M. (2017). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society (K. Habibpour Ghetabi, Trans.). Nashr-e Mohajer.
Delfani, M. (1996). Anti-culturalism in Reza Shah’s era: Unpublished documents from the Organization for the Cultivation of Thought. Sazman-e Asnad-e Melli-ye Iran.
Diakonoff, M. M. (1967). History of ancient Iran (R. Arbab, Trans.). Bongah Tarjomeh va Nashr Ketab.
Dreyfus, H., & Rabinow, P. (2013). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (H. Bashiriyeh, Trans.). Nashr-e Ney.
Foran, J. (1999). Fragile resistance: The history of Iran's social transformations from the Safavids to the Islamic Revolution (A. Tedin, Trans., 2nd ed.). Farhang-e Rasa Institute.
Foucault, M. (2017). The archaeology of knowledge (N. Sarkhosh & A. Jahandideh, Trans.). Nashr-e Ney.
Kachouyan, H. (2003). Foucault and the archaeology of knowledge: The history of humanities from the Renaissance to postmodernity. University of Tehran Press.
Katouzian, M. A. H. (2010). State and society in Iran: The fall of the Qajar dynasty and the rise of Pahlavi (H. Afshar, Trans., 5th ed.). Nashr-e Markaz.
Lemke, T. (2000, September 21–24). Foucault, governmentality and critique. Paper presented at the Rethinking Marxism Conference, University of Amherst, MA. Retrieved from http://www.thomaslemkeweb.de
Lemke, T. (2001). The birth of bio-politics: Michel Foucault's lecture at the Collège de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2), 190–207.
Nabavi, N. (2009). Intellectuals and the state in Iran: Politics, discourse, and the dilemma of authenticity (H. Fesharaki, Trans.). Shirazeh-ye Ketab Publishing.
Nafisi, S. (2009). The history of Sasanian civilization. Sherkat-e Motale'at va Nashr Ketab-e Parseh.
Noldeke, T. (1979). History of the Iranians and the Arabs (A. Zaryab, Trans.). Selseleh Entesharat Anjoman Asar Melli.
Parsāmoghadam, R. (2022). Ta'ayyun-e nazm-e goftemāni-ye khānesh-e nezhādi-ye nāsyonālīst-hā-ye romāntīk-e Irāni dar tārikh-negāri-ye mo'āser-e Irān (Az Qājāriyeh tā pāyān-e dore-ye Pahlavi). Tārikh Negāri va Tārikh-Negāri, 32(30), 33-58.
Pourpirar, N. (2000). Twelve centuries of silence: A reconsideration of Iran’s historical foundations. Nashr-e Karang.
Sadegh, I. (1966). Memoirs of a lifetime (Vol. 2). Amir Kabir Publications.
Tavakolitorghi, M. (2008). Tajaddod-e Rozmareh va Ampul-e Tadīn [Daily Modernity and the Injection of Faith]. In Encyclopedia Iranica (Vol. 15, Part 2). Iranica Institute.
Zarrinkoub, A. (1957). Two centuries of silence: A historical account of events in Iran during the first two centuries after the Arab invasion up to the emergence of the Tahirid dynasty. Ahmad Elmi Publishing.
Zarrinkoub, A. (1969). The legacy of Islam. Amir Kabir Publications.
Zia-Ebrahimi, R. (2017). The emergence of Iranian nationalism: Race and the politics of dislocation (H. Afshar, Trans.). Nashr-e Markaz.
 
 
 
استناد به این مقاله: پارسامقدم، رضا (1403). دیرینه‌شناسی تعیّن نظم گفتمانی باستانگرایانه در سیاست‌های فرهنگی پهلوی اول (با تأکید بر سازمان پرورش افکار و سازمان پیشاهنگی ایران)،  فصلنامه علوم اجتماعی، 31(104)، 109-154.   DOI: 10.22054/qjss.2025.75032.2675
 Social sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License...