An Introduction to Habermas's Critical Position on Logical Positivism

Latifi, Gholamreza

doi:10.22054/qjss.2021.33463.1844

An Introduction to Habermas's Critical Position on Logical Positivism

Document Type : Research Paper

Author

Gholamreza Latifi

Professor of Urban Planning, Allameh Tabataba'i University

https://doi.org/10.22054/qjss.2021.33463.1844

Abstract

It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later. It will be prepared later.

Keywords

Methodology

Humanities

Frankfurt School

Positivism

Pragmatism

Habermass

Here are the references formatted according to APA style:

Bordum, A. (2005). Immanuel Kant, Jürgen Habermas and the categorical imperative. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 31(7).

Ayer, A. J. (1982). Philosophy in the twentieth century. New York: Random House.

Blumberg, A., & Feigl, H. (1931). Logical positivism: A new movement in European philosophy. The Journal of Philosophy, 28(11).

Uebel, T. (2007). Carnap and the Vienna Circle: Rational reconstructionism refined. In M. Friedman & R. Creath (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Carnap. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Edgar, A. (2006). Habermas: The key concept. London and New York: Routledge.

Habermas, J. (1981). Knowledge and human interests (J. J. Shapiro, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press.

Habermas, J. (1988). On the logic of social sciences (S. W. Nicholson, Trans.). United States: MIT Press.

Jones, A., Aiello, L. M., De Francisci Morales, G., & Bonchi, F. (2022). The language of opinion change on social media under the lens of communicative action. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.17234

Myhre, J. (2023). How and why does it work? A video-based qualitative analysis of case conferences to reduce BPSD through the lens of Habermas’s theory of communicative action. BMC Health Services Research. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11265080/

Formal pragmatics and social criticism: The philosophy of language and the critique of ideology in Habermas’s theory of communicative action. (2023). International Journal of Philosophical Studies. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/01914537231203553

The public sphere and contemporary lifeworld. (2023). Critical Theory. https://academic.oup.com/ct/article/33/2-3/153/7223415

Reflections on Habermas’s discourse ethics. (2023). Verbum et Ecclesia. https://verbumetecclesia.org.za/index.php/ve/article/view/3009/7247

Outhwaite, W. (2024). Habermas and (the) Enlightenment. Philosophical Inquiry, 37(1–2), 2–18. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385904329_Habermas_and_the_Enlightenment

Social pathologies and ideologies in light of Jürgen Habermas. (2020). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-020-00563-2