Sociology
Morteza Ganji; mohsen kermani nasrabadi
Abstract
attention has been done in a situation where a limited number of policy orders of these programs have been successfully realized. One of the reasons for the failure of development programs is lack of attention to the category of program evaluation. despite the fact that any policy without being exposed ...
Read More
attention has been done in a situation where a limited number of policy orders of these programs have been successfully realized. One of the reasons for the failure of development programs is lack of attention to the category of program evaluation. despite the fact that any policy without being exposed to evaluation and modification cannot be strengthened and optimized over time and will inevitably lose its effectiveness. Based on this necessity, the present article has been compiled with the aim of identifying and clarifying the evaluation indicators of policy rulings in the field of social harms in development programs. A review of the conceptual literature of policy evaluation shows that three types of evaluation can be distinguished; Pre-evaluation, process evaluation and post-evaluation. The pre-evaluation itself can be focused on the process of formulating political rulings, the formal quality of the rulings, and the quality of their content. According to the definition of social harms and the specific nature of the involvement of people in the society with it, it seems that among the triple indicators of process, form and content, paying attention to process indicators is more important in the field of policy making in the field of social harms.
mohsen Kermani; Abolfazl Delavari
Abstract
Abstract With the rise of disputes from the rotation of the post-modern and post-structuralism and post-marxism in the social science literature, the concepts of ideology, hegemony, the subject, power and resistance became most usable and controversial concepts in this area. Outcome of this dispute was ...
Read More
Abstract With the rise of disputes from the rotation of the post-modern and post-structuralism and post-marxism in the social science literature, the concepts of ideology, hegemony, the subject, power and resistance became most usable and controversial concepts in this area. Outcome of this dispute was a range of views and interpretations of these concepts. Depending, in recent years the trend and interest in the intellectual climate of our society, particularly in terms of vogue theory and discourse analysis has been established. However, in some cases it can be seen that these concepts without attention and awareness of the theoretical and conceptual similarities and differences between them are used. Accordingly, in the present article trying with obtaining analytical and critical approach similarities and differences of these concepts in the view of most theorists in the field such as Marx, Althusser, Gramsci, Foucault and Laclau and Mouffe be studied and explained. The results of this study implies that each of these concepts find the different mean in different theories. Thus the researchers before applying any of the above concepts must identify the appropriate theoretical approach with expected meaning of these concepts.Because the traditional concept of ideology and hegemony value-loaded and is based on the existence of transcendental truth. While discourse analysts deny the existence of truth and believe that these discourses that serve to define the truth.
