«مصرف اینترنت و اثر آن در روابط همسران» - محمدحسین پناهی منصوره تبریزی

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استاد جامعه شناسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

2 دانشجوی دکتری رشته جامعه شناسی دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی

چکیده

در دوران معاصر اینترنت نقش قابل ملاحظه‌ای در زندگی و روابط انسان‌ها یافته است. بخشی از این تأثیرات به قلمروی زندگی زناشویی معطوف است. در این پژوهش کوشیده­ایم مهم‌ترین عرصه‌ها و ابعاد تأثیرگذاری اینترنت بر روابط همسران در تحقیقات پیشین را مورد واکاوی قرار دهیم. حدود چهل پژوهش که از 1995 تاکنون به موضوع اینترنت و روابط همسران مرتبط بودند شناسایی شده و با استفاده از روش تحلیل محتوای کیفی، و با اتکا به منطق استقراء، بررسی شدند. در نتیجه، دو عرصه مهم تأثیر اینترنت بر روابط همسران به­دست آمد که عبارت‌اند از: تأثیر در مناسبات زندگی روزمره، و در مرزها و حدود زناشویی. جمع‌بندی تحقیقات مورد بررسی بیشتر مؤید تأثیر منفی اینترنت بر این دو قلمرو در جوامع غربی است، هرچند پیچیدگی‌هایی دارد. ارتباط اینترنت با زندگی روزمره همسران به میزان، زمان و مکان مصرف، نوع استفاده و شرایط و برهه‌ای بستگی دارد که افراد تجربه می­کنند. برخی امکانات اینترنتی نظیر محتوای جنسی و امکان برقراری روابط مجازی نیز بر مرزهای زناشویی بیشتر تأثیر منفی داشته است، هرچند مؤلفه‌هایی چون دلایل مصرف، جنسیت، زمینه‌های روانی و خانوادگی، و روابط عاطفی یا جنسی برقرار شده، حالات گوناگونی به آن می­دهند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Internet Consumption and its Impact on the Relationships of Spouses

نویسنده [English]

  • mansoore tabrizi 2
چکیده [English]

In the contemporary era, the internet has a notable role in the life and relationships of human beings. In this research, we try to present the most important effective aspects of internet on marital relationships, and inquire its dimensions. For this reason, nearly forty researches of last two recent decades (since 1995) were recognized, and qualitative content analysis was used to distinguish two important fields of internet effects on marital life: changes in everyday relationships, and changes in marital boundaries.
The overall findings of these researches verify the effect of internet on these two realms, however the different aspects of this relationship should be considered. The effect of internet on everyday life of couples depends on the time, place, kind of consumption, and the situations and periods of a couple’s life. Some internet facilities like sexual content and cyber relationships have important effects on marital boundaries. These effects changes concerning some elements like the reason of consumption, mental, familial and gender backgrounds, and emotional and sexual relationships in the internet.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Internet
  • Couple’s Relationship
  • everyday life
  • Marital Boundaries
 

 

-   گیدنز، آنتونی. (1377)، جامعه‌شناسی. ترجمه: منوچهر صبوری. تهران: نی.

-   مک‌کوایل، دنیس (1385)، درآمدی بر نظریه ارتباطات جمعی. ترجمه: پرویز اجلالی. تهران: دفتر مطالعات و توسعه رسانه‌ها.

-   مک‌گرا، فیلیپ. (1388)، روان‌شناسی خانواده موفق. ترجمه: محمد مهدی شریعت باقری. تهران: دانژه.

-   هال، استوارت. (1382)، رمزگذاری، رمزگشایی. ترجمه: نیما ملک‌محمدی. (در مجموعه مقالات مطالعات فرهنگی). تهران: تلخون.

 

-    Antolik, Brittany & Zander, Alyssa(2010). College Students’ Definitions of Infidelity. In www.minds.wisconsin.edu

-    Bergner RM, Bridges AJ. (2002). The significance of heavy pornography involvement for romantic partners: research and clinical implications. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. Volume 28, Issue 3

-    Boneva, Bonka , Kraut, Robert , Frohlich, David (2001).  Using email for personal relationships: The difference gender makes. American Behavioral Scientist.Vol. 45, No. 3. pp. 530-549

-    Bridges, Ana. & Morokoff, Patricia J. (2011). Sexual media use and relational satisfaction in heterosexual couples. Personal Relationships.  Volume 18, Issue 4, pages 562–585

-    Campbell, Emily C. (2015). Technology, Communication, and Couples’ Intimacy: A Study of Technology Use Behavior and Intimate Relationships

-     Cooper, A., Galbreath, N., & Becker, M. A. (2004). Sexon the internet: Furthering our understanding of menwith online sexual problems. Psychology of AddictiveBehaviors, 18, 223–230.

-    Cooper, A. (1998). Sexuality and the Internet: Surfing into the new millennium. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 1, 181-187.

-    Coyne, S. M., Busby, D., Bushman, B. J., Gentile, D. a., Ridge, R., & Stockdale, L. (2012). Gaming in the game of love: Effects of video games on conflict in Couples. Family Relations, 61, 388–396.

-    Coyne, S. M., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B., & Grant, D. M. (2011). “I luv u:!”: A Descriptive Study of the Media Use of Individuals in Romantic Relationships. Family Relations, 60, 150–162

-    Daneback, Kristian, Cooper, Al, Mansson, Sven-Axel (2005). An Internet Study of Cybersex Participants. Archives of Sexual Behavior, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 321–328

-    Daneback, K., Træen, B., & Mansson, S. (2009). Useof pornography in a random sample of Norwegianheterosexual couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior,38, 746–753.

-    Dijkstra. Pieternel, Barelds. Dick P. H. and Groothof. (2013). Jealousy in response to online and offline infidelity: the role of sex and sexual orientation. Skandinavian journal of sociology. 54. Pages 328-336

-    Dijkstra. Pieternel, Barelds. Dick P. H. and Groothof. Hinke A. K. (2010). An inventory and update of jealousy-evoking partner behaviors in modern society. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. Volume 17, Issue 4. Pages 269–353.

-    Goldberg, peter (2004). An exploratory study about the impacts that cubersex is having on families and the practices of marriages and family trapists. In www.theses.lib.vt.edu

-    Henline, B., Lamke, L., & Howard, M. (2007). Exploring perceptions of online infidelity. Personal Relationships, 14 (7), 113- 128.

-    Hertleine, Katherine M. & Ancheta, Katrina (2014). Advantages and disadvantages of technology in relationship. The qualitative report, volume 19. Article 22

-    Hertleine, Katherine M., Piercy, Fred P. (2006). Internet Infidelity: A Critical Review of the Literature. The Family Journal; 14

-    Hughes, Jr., R. & Hans, J. D. (2004). Effects of the Internet on families. In M. Coleman & L. Ganong (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary families (pp. 506-520). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

-    Jennings, Nancy, Ellen, Wartella (2004). Technology and the family. In Anita L. Vangelisti (Ed). Handbook of family communication. London: LEA

-    Kerkhof, Peter, Finkenauer, Catrin andMuusses, Linda D. (2005). Relational consequences of compulsive internet Use: A longitudinal study among newlyweds. Human Communication Research.Volume 37, Issue 2, pages 147–173

-    Kimberly J. Mitchell, Kathryn A. Becker-Blease, and David Finkelhor (2005). Inventory of Problematic Internet Experiences Encountered in Clinical Practice. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. Vol. 36, No. 5, 498–509

-    Kraut, Robert, Patterson, Michael, Lundmark, Vicki, Kiesler, Sara, Mukophadhyay, Tridas, Scherlis,William (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American psychologists. 53. 1017-1031

-    Kraut, (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues. Volume 58, Issue 1, pages 49–74

-    Lull, James (1980). Family communication patterns and the social uses of television. Communication research. No 7

-    Manning, Jill C. (2006). The Impact of Internet Pornography on Marriage and the Family: A Review of the Research. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 13:131–165

-    Morrison, Matgaret & Krugan, Dean M. (2001). A look at mass computer mediated technologies. Journal of broadcasting and electronic media. Winter 2001

-    Neustaedter, C., & Pang, C. & Forghani, A. & Odour, E (2015).Sharing Domestic Life through Long-Term Video Connections, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions, Vol. 22, No. 1

-    Neustaedter, C., & Greenberg, S. (2012). Intimacy in long-distance relationships over video chat. t. In Proceed-ings of CHI.ACM, New York, NY.

Nie, Norman H. Sunshine Hillugus, D. Erbring, Lutz (2002). Internet use, interpersonal relations and sociability: a time dairy study. In Barry Wellman, Caroline Heythornthwaite (Eds.), the internet in everyday life. Axford: Blackwell

-    Parker, T. S., & Wampler, K. S. (2003). How bad is it?Perceptions of the relationship impact of differenttypes of Internet sexual activity. Contemporary FamilyTherapy: An International Journal, 25, 415–429.

-    Papp, L. M., Danielewicz, J., & Cayemberg, C. (2012). “Are we Facebook official?” Implications of dating partners’ Facebook use and profiles for intimate relationship satisfaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15, 85–90. doi:10.1089/cyber. 2011.0291

-    Poulsen, Franklin O. & Busby, Dean M. (2013). Pornography Use: Who Uses It and How It Is Associated with Couple Outcomes. Journal of sex research, 50(1), 72–83

-    Robinson, B. E., Manthei, R., Scheltema, K., Rich, R. & Koznar, J. (1999). Therapeutic uses of sexuallyexplicit materials in the UnitedStates and the Czechand Slovak Republics: A qualitative study. Journal ofSex and Marital Therapy, 25, 103–119.

-    Schneider, Jennifer P. (2000a). Effects of cybersex addiction on the family. Sexual addiction and compulsivity. 7: 31-58

-    Schneider, Jennifer P. (2000b). A Qualitative study of Cybersex Participants: Gender Differences, Recovery Issues, and Implications for Therapists. Sexual addiction and compulsivity. 7:249-278

-    Schneider, Jennifer P. (2012). Is it really cheating? Sexual addiction and compulsivity. 19: 123-139

-    Stack, S., Wasserman, I., & Kern, R. (2004). Adult social bonds and use of Internet pornography. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 75–88.

-    Szymanski, David M., Stewart-Richardson, Destin N. (2014). Psychological, Relational, and Sexual Correlates of Pornography Use on Young Adult Heterosexual Men in Romantic Relationships. The journal of the men's studies, VOL. 22, NO. 1, Winter 2014, 64-82

-    Whitty, Monica, Theresse. (2003). Pushing the wrong buttons. Men's and women's attitudes toward the online and offline infidelity. Cyber psychology and behavior. Volume6, number6

-    Whitty, M.T. & Quigley, L. (2008). Emotional and sexual infidelityoffline and in cyberspace. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy,34(4), 461-468

-    Yong, Kimberly S. Cooper, Alvin, Griffiths-Shelley, Eric, O'Mara, James and Buchanan, Jennifer (2000). Cybersex and infidelity online: Implications for evaluation and treatment. Sexual Addiction and Compulsivity, 7(10), 59-74

-    Whitchurch, Gail. G. & Constantine, Larry. I. (2009). System theory. In Pauline boss & others (Eds). sourcebook of family theories and methods. Springer

-    Willams, Amanda L., Merton, Michael J. (2011). Ifamily: family and social media technology in the family context. Family and cosumer science research journal. Vol. 40. No.2. 150-170.