نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار، گروه معارف اهل‌البیت دانشکدۀ الهیات و معارف اهل‌البیت دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

2 دکتری مطالعات زنان، پژوهشکدۀ مهرستان (مطالعات حکمرانی)، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

3 کارشناسی ارشد مطالعات زنان، دانشگاه اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران

چکیده

مطالعه حاضر باهدف تبیین عوامل مرتبط با نگرش دانشجویان دانشگاه اصفهان به پدیده ازدواج، در چارچوب رویکرد ترکیبی و با استفاده از استراتژی اکتشافی– متوالی به انجام رسیده است. روش مورداستفاده در مرحله کیفی پژوهش نظریه زمینه‍ای و در مرحله کمی پیمایش بوده است. مشارکت‍کنندگان پژوهش در مرحله کیفی 30 نفر از دانشجویان دانشگاه‍های اصفهان، صنعتی اصفهان و علوم پزشکی اصفهان و در مرحله کمّی 400 نفر از دانشجویان دانشگاه‍های اصفهان بودند. تکنیک گردآوری داده‍ها در دو مرحله کیفی و کمی پژوهش به ترتیب مصاحبه عمیق نیمه‍ساختاریافته و پرسشنامه بود. یافته‍های پژوهش در مرحله کیفی نشان‍دهنده این است که عوامل مرتبط با نگرش دانشجویان در قالب چند مقوله اصلی شامل موانع مفصل‍بندی‍شده، تصویرسازی ازدواج، خودارزیابی ذهنی، ترس نهادینه‍شده، فضای دانشگاهی و پیامدپنداری ازدواج صورت‍بندی شده‍اند. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد عوامل مرتبط با نگرش دانشجویان به ازدواج درمجموع در حد متوسط به بالا توان تبیین واریانس این متغیر را دارند. ضرایب تأثیر نیز نشان‍دهنده اثر مستقیم و معنادار متغیرهای تصویرسازی ازدواج، خودارزیابی ذهنی، فضای دانشگاهی و پیامدپنداری بر نگرش دانشجویان به ازدواج بوده است و نتایج کمّی پژوهش تا حد زیادی نتایج کیفی را تأیید می‍کنند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying and Explaining the Factors Related to the Attitude of Isfahan University Students Towards Marriage (A Study with a Mixed Method)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Saleh Tayebnia 1
  • Rahele Kardavani 2
  • Saeedeh Yaraghy 3

1 Assistant Professor, Ahl al-Bayt Education Group, Ahl al-Bayt, Faculty of Theology and Education, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2 PhD of Women Studies,, Mehrestan Research Institute (governance studies), University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

3 MA of Women Studies, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

چکیده [English]

The purpose of this research is to explain the factors related to the attitude of students of Isfahan University towards the phenomenon of marriage, in the framework of a combined approach and using the exploratory-sequential strategy. The grounded theory method was used in the qualitative phase of the research, and the survey method was used in the quantitative phase. The results of this research show that the factors related to students' attitude towards marriage are able to explain the variance of this variable in a medium to high level. The effect coefficients have also shown the direct and significant effect of the variables of marriage imagery, subjective self-evaluation, academic atmosphere and consequentialism on students' attitude towards marriage, and the quantitative results of the research confirm the qualitative results to a large extent.
Introduction
Marriage, as the foundation of family and social life, has taken on various forms and shapes in the contemporary world. In Iranian society, attitudes towards marriage and marital behavior have been influenced by the transformations of the modern world, as well as changing obstacles and challenges compared to the past. Despite its significance for society and the continuity of its structures, marriage has faced challenges in recent decades. Students are considered one of the most important social groups, primarily in the age range for marriage. The weakening inclination of students towards marriage and consequently the delay in their marriage can lead to significant cultural, social, and economic issues for the Iranian society in the future.
The present study aims to adopt a pragmatic paradigm and utilize a combined strategic, action-oriented, and result-oriented approach in this regard. By applying this combined approach, the study seeks to find practical and implementable solutions to strengthen the inclination of students towards marriage and reduce the delay in their marriage.
Literature Review
Research on various aspects of marriage has been extensive. However, no research has been conducted on the identification and explanation of factors related to students' attitudes towards marriage in the city of Isfahan. Sohrab Zadeh and Parnian (2016), in a qualitative study titled "Categorization of Girls' Inclination towards Marriage," identified seven categories of inclination towards marriage, including enclosed inclination and hierarchical categories influenced by postmodern discourse. These categories had characteristics such as acceptance of male dominance, women's citizenship, and the acceptance of religious and cultural obligations towards marriage. Avaresin and Nazari (2018), in their study titled "Attitudes of Islamic Azad University Tabriz Branch Students towards Marriage," using a descriptive-case study approach and an expectation measurement questionnaire, showed that realistic expectations of marriage were given higher priority, while pessimistic expectations had the lowest priority. Additionally, as age increased, the overall expectation of marriage decreased for realistic and idealistic marriage, while pessimistic expectations increased. It is worth noting that while the level of expectations from marriage was measured in this research, students' attitudes towards marriage were not investigated.
Li (2014) demonstrated in their study on young people's attitudes towards marriage that children's attitudes towards marriage were highly dependent on the parent/family environment. Those whose parents experienced conflict, divorce, and post-divorce parental conflicts expressed a negative attitude towards marriage.
The combined quantitative and qualitative approach, utilizing an exploratory-sequential strategy and developing a researcher-made questionnaire based on qualitative findings (identified concepts and categories), is one of the advantages of this research. Moreover, the inclusion of both male and female participants differentiates this study from previous ones.
Methodology
The research method used a combination of quantitative and qualitative approaches. The quantitative approach involves the use of a questionnaire to collect data on students' attitudes towards marriage, while the qualitative approach includes in-depth interviews to explore the underlying factors influencing their attitudes. The participants in this research were selected from both male and female students, which allows for a comprehensive understanding of the topic. By including diverse perspectives, the study aims to capture a broader range of experiences and opinions related to marriage.
The research process consists of several steps. First, a comprehensive review of the literature was conducted to identify existing theories and findings related to students' attitudes towards marriage. This review helped to establish a theoretical framework for the study and guide
Conclusion
Based on the coding of the interviews, eight main themes were identified, including structured barriers, multidimensional self-evaluation, entrenched fear of failure, visualization of marriage, university environment, psychological-emotional consequences, social consequences, and economic consequences.
Following that, the questions and hypotheses for the quantitative section were formulated:
Question (1): What is the attitude of students towards marriage?
Hypothesis (1): There is a difference in attitudes towards marriage between male and female students.
Hypothesis (2): Qualitative variables have an impact on students' attitudes towards marriage.
The results showed the following:

a) The distribution of the research sample based on gender indicated that 8.34% of the sample were male students and 3.65% were female students.
b) The average of the variable "attitude towards marriage" and its dimensions differs significantly from the hypothetical average. Therefore, factors related to students' attitudes towards marriage, on average, have the ability to explain the variance of this variable, indicating confidence in the findings.
c) Furthermore, the values related to the estimation of the independent t-test indicate that there is a significant difference between male and female students in terms of their attitude towards marriage.
d) The independent variables of the study, in total, explain 51% of the variance in the "attitude towards marriage" variable. Considering the values related to effect size and the coefficient of determination, this value is estimated to be large. In other words, the independent variables of the study have a high ability to explain the variance of the "attitude towards marriage" variable.

 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Attitude
  • Marriage
  • Students
  • Isfahan University
  • Hybrid Approach
 
Aghasi, M. & Fallah Min Bashi, F. (2015). Iranian Youth's Attitudes towards Marriage, Spouse Selection, and Family Formation (In Persian). Women's Research Journal Special Issue, 6(1), 1-21.
Askari Nedoushan, A. Abbasi Shavazi, M.J. & Sadeghi, R. (2009). Mothers, Daughters, and Marriage (Gender Differences in Ideas and Attitudes towards Marriage in Yazd City) (In Persian). Strategic Studies of Women, 11(44), 7-36.
Azazi, S. (2010). Sociology of the Family: Emphasizing the Role, Structure, and Function of the Family in Contemporary Era (In Persian). Tehran: Roshangaran and Women's Studies Publications.
Azimi Hashemi, M. Azam-Kari, F. Biganeh, M. & Razamanesh, F. (2015). Values, Attitudes, and Behavioral Patterns of Youth Regarding Mate Selection and Pre-Marital Relationships: A Case Study of University Students in Khorasan Razavi Province (In Persian). Rahbord-e Farhang, 29, 179-212.
Boostani, D. & Mohammadpour, A. (2009). Reconstruction of the Meaning of Boys' Gender Orientation toward Girls (Presenting a Grounded Theory) (In Persian). Strategic Studies of Women, 11(44), 142-172.
Campbell, D.T and Stanley, J.C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Corbin, J. & Strauss, A. (2015). Basic of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Coulton, G. (2013). How to Sample in Surveys: A Beginner's Guide. Translated into Persian by Behrooz Goranpayeh. Tehran: Ney.
Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Research. Theory into Practice. 39(3): 124 -130.
Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Reserach: Planning. Conducting and Evaluating.
Creswell, John W. (2012). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Translated into Persian by Ali Reza Kiamanesh & Maryam Danaei-Tous. Tehran: Jihad Daneshgahi Publications.
Davies, D. (2008). Research Design in Social Research. Translated into Persian by Hooshang Naebi. Tehran: Agah.
Forutan, Y. (2018). A Sociological Approach to Marriage Patterns in Iran (In Persian). Iranian Journal of Sociology, 13(26), 9-36.
Goode, W. J. (1963). World revolution and family patterns. NewYork: Free press.
Gubernskaya, Zoya (2010). Changing Attitudes toward Marriage and
Children in Six Countries. Sociological Perspectives. 53(2): 178-200.
Hazrati, S. & Nouri, R. (2020). Investigating Attitudes toward Marriage Based on Religious Beliefs in Female and Male Students. (In Persian). Advances in Behavioral Sciences, 5(53), 39-47.
Iman, M.T. (2012). Methodology of Qualitative Research (In Persian). Qom: Research Institute of the Seminary and University.
Kazempour, Sh. (2009). Measuring Youth Attitudes toward Marriage and Understanding its Effects and Consequences with Emphasis on Student Marriage (In Persian). Culture in Islamic University, 13(2), 95-75.
Kim, H.S. & Jung, Y.M. (2015). Self-differentiation, family functioning, life satisfaction and attitudes towards marriage among South Korean university students. Indian Journal of Science and Technology. 8(19), 1-8.
Lesthaeghe, R. (1995) The Second Demographic Transition in Western Countries: An Interpretation, PP.17-61, In K. O. Mason & A-M. Jensened.s). Gender and Family Change in Industrial Countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Li, X. (2014). What influences the attitudes of people in the United States toward marriage? A critical review. The Family Journal, 22(3), 292-297.
Mahmoudian, H. (2004). Increasing Age at Marriage: Exploring Supporting Factors (In Persian). Social Sciences Letter, 24, 147-164.
Maleki Avaresin, S. & Seyyed Nazari, N. (2018). Attitudes of Islamic Azad University Students in Tabriz towards Expectations of Marriage (In Persian). Journal of New Advances in Behavioral Sciences, 11(42), 27-7.
McDonald, P. (2006). Low Fertility and the State: The Efficacy of Policy. Population and Development Review. 32(3): 485-510.
Mitra, P. (2004). Effect of socio-economic characteristics on age at marriage and total fertility in Nepal. Journal of Health and Population. 22(1): 84-96.
Morgan, D. L. (1998). Practical strategies for combining qualitative and quantitative methods: Applications to health research. Qualitative Health Research. 8(3), 362–376.
Rasouli, E. (2021). Youth Attitudes towards Cohabitation (In Persian). Afagh Humanities Monthly, 5(15), 51-70.
Rosina, A. (2004) Is marriage losing its centrality in Italy?, Demographic Research. 11, 149-172.
Sabaghchi, M. Askari Nedoushan, A. & Tarabi, F. (2017). Determining Factors of Attitudes towards Marriage and Family Formation in Yazd City (In Persian). Journal of Population Studies (Motala'at-e Jame'i), 3(1), 131-162.
Sarmad, Z, Bazargan, A, & Hejazi, E. (2016). Research Methods in Behavioral Sciences (In Persian). Tehran: Agah.
Shahrabi Farahani, L. Fatehizadeh, M. & Etemadi, A. (2019). Exploring Attitudes towards Spouse Selection in Girls on the Threshold of Marriage: A Qualitative Study (In Persian). Counseling Research (Tazeha va Pazhuheshha-ye Moshavereh), 18(69), 133-162.
Shahrabi Farahani, Lila, Fatehizadeh, Maryam, and Etemadi, Azra. (2019). Discovering spouse selection attitudes in girls on the threshold of marriage: A qualitative study. Counseling Research (New Approaches and Counseling Studies), 18(69), 133-162.
Sohrabzadeh, M. & Parnian, L. (2016). Categorization of Attitudes towards Marriage among Girls (Case Study: Shiraz University Students) (In Persian). Iranian Cultural Research, 9(1), 83-114.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (2012). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Translated into Persian by Ebrahim Afshar. Tehran: Ney.
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques, Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
Tashakori, A., & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and quantitative aapproaches: Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage.
Teddlie, Ch & Tashakkori, A. (2016). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. Translated into Persian by Adel Azar & Saeed Jahanian. Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi Publishing Organization.
Thornton, A. and D. Freedman (1982). Changing Attitudes toward Marriage and Single Life. Family Planning Perspectives. 14(6): 297-303.
Van de Kaa, D. J. (2002). The idea of a second demographic transition in industrialized countries. Birth. 35, 45.
 
 
 
استناد به این مقاله: طیب‌نیا، محمدصالح.، کاردوانی، راحله.، یراقی، سعیده. (1401). شناسایی و تبیین عوامل مرتبط با نگرش دانشجویان دانشگاه اصفهان به ازدواج (مطالعهای با رویکرد ترکیبی)، فصلنامه علوم اجتماعی، 30(99)، 1-46.   DOI: 10.22054/qjss.2023.75566.2689
 Social sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License...