نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه مطالعات زنان، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری رشته رفاه اجتماعی، دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

 
زنان عشایر نقش حیاتی در زمینه‌های اقتصادی و اجتماعی جوامع خود ایفا می‌کنند و از طریق دانش بومی خود به توسعه پایدار کمک می‌کنند. با وجود چالش‌های زیادی مانند محرومیت از رفاه و خدمات بهداشتی، این زنان دارای عاملیت قابل‌توجهی هستند. این مقاله به توصیف تجربه عاملیت و قدرت از منظر زنان عشایر اختصاص دارد. در این راستا و برای فهم عمیق‍تر از مفاهیم تحلیلی مانند عاملیت، مقاومت، تقسیم‌کار جنسیتی و چانه‍زنی استفاده شده است. با استفاده از روش تحلیل تماتیک، مصاحبه‍های عمیق و نیمه‍ساختمند با 17 زن عشایر منطقه چاه غلامعلی در شهرستان زرند انجام شد. یافته‍ها حاکی از استخراج دو مقوله اصلی با عنوان عاملیت محقق‍شده و مقاومت به‌مثابه عاملیت پنهان، چهار مقوله فرعی شامل عاملیت تصمیم‌ساز، عاملیت تسهیلگر، قدرت مجاب‌سازی و مدیریت زندگی زناشویی و مفاهیمی از قبیل، تصمیم‍ساز در ازدواج فرزندان، زن به‌مثابه مشاور مالی خانواده، مانع‍زدایی برای ادامه‍ی تحصیل، زنان به‌مثابه محرک‍های مهاجرت، استفاده از واسطه‌ها، به‌کارگیری برتری سرمایه فرهنگی، ایجاد فشار فرهنگی، فریب همسر، اختفا و تظاهر به حفظ اقتدار مرد و 115 عبارت معنایی است. بر اساس یافته‌های این مقاله می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که بزنگاه‌های ساده و درعین‌حال مهمی وجود دارد که در آن زنان عشایر موردمطالعه به انحا و اشکال گوناگون عاملیت را در چارچوب خانواده تجربه می‌کنند اما دراین‌باره از تجربه واحدی برخوردار نیستند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

A Sociological Study of the Agency of Nomadic Women Through Their Lived Experiences (Case Study: Nomadic Women of Chah-Gholamali Village, Zarand County)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamideh Dabbaghi 1
  • Kosar Mohammadi Hanjaroi 2

1 Assistant Professor of Women Studies, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

2 PhD student in social welfare, Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

 
Nomadic women play a vital role in the economic and social spheres of their communities, contributing to sustainable development through their indigenous knowledge. Despite facing significant challenges such as deprivation of welfare and healthcare, they exhibit considerable agency. This study challenges the perception that agency is exclusive to modern societies by demonstrating that nomadic women exercise their influence both overtly and covertly. Through a qualitative approach and thematic analysis of interviews with 17 women from Chah-Gholamali, two main themes (realized agency and resistance as hidden agency), four sub-themes (marital life management, persuasion power, decision-making agency, and facilitating agency), 10 concepts, and 115 meaningful phrases were identified. "Realized agency" refers to agency that is visibly observable. In the case of "facilitating agency," women do not hold a decisive role but act as facilitators. Findings show that while these women often hold decisive roles in family decisions, they also maintain the symbolic authority of men. The study highlights the complex and varied ways nomadic women experience and exert agency within their family structures.
Keywords: Nomadic Women, Agency, Resistance, Gender Division of Labor, Bargaining.

Introduction

Nomadic women, who lead challenging lives, play a crucial role in economic and social activities, contributing to the sustainable development of tribal communities through their indigenous knowledge. In many rural and nomadic societies, these women face significant deprivation of welfare and healthcare services, enduring arduous labor in their daily lives. Despite these challenges, nomadic women are not powerless. At first glance, the concept of agency may seem exclusive to modern societies and may not appear to align closely with the characteristics of traditional communities. However, this study aims to demonstrate that such perceptions often arise from the assumption that centralists believe desirable traits and concepts are exclusive to urban and central societies, while peripheral communities are perceived as inferior. Such assumptions result from a lack of understanding. During the researcher's field visit, it became evident that nomadic women are far from powerless and, in fact, exhibit significant influence in critical moments, either openly or covertly exercising their agency. This article seeks to answer a key question: How is agency understood through the experiences of nomadic women?

Literature Review

This section draws on four key concepts: agency, resistance, bargaining, and gender-based division of labor. Numerous definitions of agency exist in the social sciences. Emirbayer & Mische describe agency as the involvement of actors in various structural environments. For the concept of resistance, we have drawn on Foucault’s work, which links power relations with various forms of resistance. To explain bargaining, we refer to household decision-making bargaining models that clarify the mechanisms through which resources are allocated between men and women in households and the outcomes of such processes. Finally, we address theories related to the gender-based division of labor, including exchange theory and feminist perspectives.

Methodology

This study uses a qualitative approach with thematic analysis. The study population consists of 17 nomadic women from the village of Chah-Gholamali, located in the rural district of Zarand County in Kerman Province. Participants were selected through non-random, purposive sampling.

Results

From the analysis of in-depth and semi-structured interviews, two main themes (realized agency and resistance as hidden agency), four sub-themes (marital life management, persuasion power, decision-making agency, and facilitating agency), 10 concepts, and 115 meaningful phrases were identified. "Realized agency" refers to agency that is visibly observable. In the case of "facilitating agency," women do not hold a decisive role but act as facilitators. In other words, while they may not be the primary decision-makers or play a significant role in shaping decisions, they create conditions that facilitate the implementation of their desires. In this context, women notably encourage their families to migrate or focus on their children's education. In the case of "decision-making agency," women occasionally make decisions independently, or if they are not the primary decision-makers, they still play a decisive role in family decisions. For instance, they influence final decisions in matters such as their children's marriage or family finances. Agency is not always overt or easily identifiable; in many instances, it manifests subtly and covertly. The strategies employed by actors in hidden agency tend to have a more significant impact than direct or overt displays of power. One of the primary strategies women use to assert their resistance is persuading their husbands. Moreover, women are not solely focused on persuading their husbands; they also strive to manage their family lives through other methods discussed in this paper.

Conclusion

Field observations and interviews with participants reveal that nomadic women are not powerless contrary to common stereotypes. On the contrary, they are influential and active participants in their families' and communities' economic and social spheres, consistently striving to play these roles through various means. However, it is essential to acknowledge that their efforts are not always successful. The findings indicate that, due to unavoidable circumstances, the full burden of family life, including principal and minor decisions, rests on their shoulders. For instance, when the father was ill or incapacitated, the mother assumed the household responsibility. Despite these significant responsibilities, the women in the study made deliberate efforts to preserve the authority of men, even when this authority was more symbolic than real. For example, even if they were the key decision-makers behind essential matters such as their children’s marriages or family migrations, they often chose to include men in the process, ensuring their involvement was acknowledged. The study concludes that nomadic women experience agency in diverse and intriguing ways within the family structure, with no uniform pattern across their experiences. Their agency manifests both openly and subtly, underscoring the complexity of their roles in family dynamics and the wider community. This diversity of agency is a testament to the multifaceted nature of their influence.
 
 
 
 
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Nomadic Women
  • Agency
  • Resistance
  • Gender Division of Labor
  • Bargaining
 
Abdikadyrova, Z., Kadyrov, Z., Talaspayeva, Z., & Sharypkazy, N. (2018). The role of women in Kazakh nomadic society. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 2404-2419.
Afkhami, M., & Friedl, E. (Eds.). (1994). In the eye of the storm: Women in post-revolutionary Iran. Syracuse University Press.
Agarwal, B. (1997). Bargaining and gender relations: Within and beyond the household. Feminist Economics, 3(1), 1-51.
Alhojailan, M. I., & Ibrahim, M. (2012). Thematic analysis: A critical review of its process and evaluation. West East Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 39-47.
Bostan, H. (2006). Revision of gender role theories. Women's Research, 14, 5-31. [In Persian].
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
Card, D., Rute Cardoso, A., & Kline, P. (2013). Bargaining and the gender wage gap: A direct assessment. IZA Discussion Papers 7592, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
Cunha, V., & Atalaia, S. (2019). The gender(ed) division of labour in Europe: Patterns of practices in 18 EU countries. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, (90), 113-137.
Dinero, S. C. (1997). Female role change and male response in the post-nomadic urban environment: The case of the Israeli Negev Bedouin. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 248-261.
Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023.
Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45-65.
Faramarzi, F. (2019). Determining the methods of exercising women's power and resistance in the family environment (Case study: Ivan city). Master’s thesis, Payam Noor University. [In Persian].
Friedl, E. (1967). The position of women: Appearance and reality. Anthropological Quarterly, 40(3), 97-108.
Garossi, S. (2015). Gender, society and sociology. Tehran: Sociologists Publication. [In Persian].
Ghasemi, Y., & Hashemi, A. (2018). Conducting research using thematic analysis method: A practical and step-by-step guide for learning and teaching (Case study: Music consumption of master’s students of Ilam University). Ilam Culture, 64, 65, 7-33. [In Persian].
Ghodrati, H., Afraciabi, H., Barshad, A., & Moltafet, H. (2012). Gender Equity between Couples and Its Social Determinants Case: Married Women in Boshehr City. Women's Studies Sociological and Psychological. Vol 10. Issue 4.63-38 [In Persian].
Hosseinzadehrad, K. (2008). Is it possible to resist power? Political Science, 8, 119-128. [In Persian].
Kermani, M., & Delawari, A. (2016). Ideology and discourse: The subject, power and truth. Social Sciences Quarterly, 74, 111-148. [In Persian].
Legit, M. (2016). Women in their time, the history of feminism in the West (N. Mahdian, Trans.). Tehran: Ney Publication. [In Persian].
Mirzakhani, K. (2019). Sociological study of rural and nomadic women's empowerment strategies. New Research Approaches in Management and Accounting, 45, 11-24. [In Persian].
Mottier, V. (2002). Masculine domination: Gender and power in Bourdieu's writings. Feminist Theory, 3(3), 345-359.
Rahmani, J., & Farahzad, Y. (2016). Votive tables in Tehran: Female agency in religious congregations. Iran Anthropological Research, 2, 183-200. [In Persian].
Restrepo, E. (2007). Sociology and anthropology of kinship in nomads: Women of tribe Bahamei (J. Rafifar, Trans.). Tehran: Khojasteh Publication. [In Persian].
Rezaeimoghadam, M. (2012). Structures affecting gender inequality in poor rural households.Master’s thesis, Shiraz University. [In Persian].
Ribnes McCarthy, J., & Edwards, R. (2011). Key concepts in family studies (M. M. Labibi, Trans.). Tehran: Elm Publication. [In Persian].
Robb, J. (2010). Beyond agency. World Archaeology, 42(4), 493-520.
Rogers, S. C. (1975). Female forms of power and the myth of male dominance: A model of female/male interaction in peasant society. American Ethnologist, 2(4), 727-756.
Saidigaraghani, H., Arzani, H., & Razzaghi Burkhani, F. (2016). Cultural ecology, analysis of ecological knowledge of nomadic women. Indigenous Knowledge of Iran, 5, 173-199. [In Persian].
Shahshahani, S. (1988). Four seasons of the sun: The daily life of the settled nomadic women of Mamsani. Tehran: Tos Publication. [In Persian].
Soltanibahram, S., Mirzaei, H., & Ghasemzadeh, D. (2012). Agency and structure in Michel Foucault's thought. Sociological Studies, 17, 55-69. [In Persian].
Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 1-10.
Trethewey, A. (1997). Resistance, identity, and empowerment: A postmodern feminist analysis of clients in a human service organization. Communication Monographs, 64(4), 281-301.
Vedadhir, A., Chaghalvand, M., Omidhar, N., & Rafi Far, J. (2016). Food, gender, and power: An ethnographic study of Lak nomads of Lorestan Province. Social Sciences Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, 2, 33-71. [In Persian].
 
استناد به این مقاله: دباغی، حمیده.، محمدی هنجروئی، کوثر. (1402). مطالعه جامعه‌شناختی عاملیت زنان عشایر از خلال تجربه زیسته آن‌ها (مورد مطالعه: زنان عشایر ده چاه-غلامعلی از توابع شهرستان زرند)، فصلنامه علوم اجتماعی، 30(102)، 107-141.   DOI: 10.22054/qjss.2024.77686.2741
 Social sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License...