Sociology
Hasan Nazari; Seyfollah Seyfollahi; Hasan Saraie
Abstract
The present study has been conducted with the aim of offering a sociological examination and explanation of the discourse of political identity in Iran after the revolution. Therefore, the concept of political identity has been the focus of the investigation, and its semantic transformations has first ...
Read More
The present study has been conducted with the aim of offering a sociological examination and explanation of the discourse of political identity in Iran after the revolution. Therefore, the concept of political identity has been the focus of the investigation, and its semantic transformations has first been studied in the macro semantic spectrum of the Islamic Revolution, and then in the two discourses of reformist and conservative parties in the framework of intra and inter-textual analysis according to discourse theory and using critical discourse analysis in six historically important and influential junctures during these years. Subsequently, as a way of extra-textual analysis, the historical, economic, political and cultural context of each period has been examined. Finally, this analysis and explanation have depicted a series of final typologies regarding the topic, mainly being: The desired political identity of the legal positivist liberal subject, the democratic anti-tyranny subject, the religious justice-seeking subject, the revolutionary obligation-centered subject, the populist anti-abuse subject, the moderate, justice-oriented critic subject.
mohsen Kermani; Abolfazl Delavari
Abstract
Abstract With the rise of disputes from the rotation of the post-modern and post-structuralism and post-marxism in the social science literature, the concepts of ideology, hegemony, the subject, power and resistance became most usable and controversial concepts in this area. Outcome of this dispute was ...
Read More
Abstract With the rise of disputes from the rotation of the post-modern and post-structuralism and post-marxism in the social science literature, the concepts of ideology, hegemony, the subject, power and resistance became most usable and controversial concepts in this area. Outcome of this dispute was a range of views and interpretations of these concepts. Depending, in recent years the trend and interest in the intellectual climate of our society, particularly in terms of vogue theory and discourse analysis has been established. However, in some cases it can be seen that these concepts without attention and awareness of the theoretical and conceptual similarities and differences between them are used. Accordingly, in the present article trying with obtaining analytical and critical approach similarities and differences of these concepts in the view of most theorists in the field such as Marx, Althusser, Gramsci, Foucault and Laclau and Mouffe be studied and explained. The results of this study implies that each of these concepts find the different mean in different theories. Thus the researchers before applying any of the above concepts must identify the appropriate theoretical approach with expected meaning of these concepts.Because the traditional concept of ideology and hegemony value-loaded and is based on the existence of transcendental truth. While discourse analysts deny the existence of truth and believe that these discourses that serve to define the truth.
ebrahim foyuzat; majid nesar
Volume 11, Issue 27 , November 2004, , Pages 43-73
Abstract
Social movements as one of the important subjects in sociology, lately have achieved special position, so that Alen Touran means sociology as a knowledge of social movements. In this essay interim emphasizing on social movements and their theoretical dimentions, using documentary method, we point out ...
Read More
Social movements as one of the important subjects in sociology, lately have achieved special position, so that Alen Touran means sociology as a knowledge of social movements. In this essay interim emphasizing on social movements and their theoretical dimentions, using documentary method, we point out to formation contexts of Jungle movement as one of the independent and popular movements which was formed following requests of inability of state, constitution movement and in effect of factors such as inequalities conflict of interests international conditions (first world war) exploitation and class oppression. Jungle movement in spite of internal and external agitated conditions, meanwhile presenting its ideology and platform and announcing republic. hoisted flug of fighting to oppresion and defencing independence and liberty of Iranian peopel. Mirzakoochak as a leader of this movement - that was accompanied by constitution intellectuals and libertiants and in order to fighting to internal oppression and external exploitation resorted to resisting to revolutionary compaign and mobilizing material and spiritual resources successed during colonists and internal depotism and initiated formost repulic system in Iran. Finally this movement because of international comprising between the Soviet republics and Great Britain and internal comprising between state of Iran and Soviet repablice, on internal problems attacking military forces of state, defeated.